From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763409AbYDVPem (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:34:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752643AbYDVPeH (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:34:07 -0400 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.186]:44338 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752130AbYDVPeF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:34:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aPlpuH+8yTKOtVC8hmpmmceV/oVLb8gVA88vH7bDn3NgjL/CrEz+WEScUrlC3Ia6/fG4a3YgKEeWW0tgtFRPGheqRaS+AG3lR68HbcfN6ui750D735FP4kYwkXaCaR/PEQ9G6seJTUO1oyC7RLGjTWyhDdz804+uxhHETFXnInA= Message-ID: <87a5b0800804220834q4d6daec1x4146d211115ab5c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:34:03 +0100 From: "Will Newton" To: "Kyle McMartin" Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS Cc: "Randy Dunlap" , "Linux Kernel list" , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080422152426.GG19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <87a5b0800804220513t75690ceao938a288596b5ad0c@mail.gmail.com> <20080422081211.e85989ec.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <87a5b0800804220816y72a7f4f9gec2111df08a1a57f@mail.gmail.com> <20080422152426.GG19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:16:17PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > > It can be done with Kconfig. Whether it should be or not depends on > > your point of view, hence RFC. Currently __ARCH_WANT macros is the way > > syscalls are enabled and disabled across architectures. If there's > > consensus that it should be done via Kconfig that could certainly be > > implmented, but that's a different patch. > > > > It's currently done in unistd.h for hysterical raisins. All new > conditional syscalls have been done in Kconfig. Do you have a syscall in mind that does this in the correct way? BTW, don't blame the blackfin guys for this, I'm thinking about future architectures that may be added rather than any existing ones. ;-)