Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions

[Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>]

On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:15:25 +0800, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 06:49 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote:
> >> On 05/29/2012 09:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>>> s/return/Returns
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for comments!
> >>>>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't
> >>>> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set.
> >>>> So something like:
> >>>> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style.
> >>> Is the following new update patch ok?
> >>
> >>
> >> Any further comments for this patch? :)
> > 
> > Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> Does someone like to pick up this patch? :)

Applied, thanks!

Cheers,
Rusty.