From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make safe some helpers building on container_of
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:53:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ab0tybo9.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090916224157.cfa621c4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:41:57 -0700")
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:27:00 +0200 Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu> wrote:
>
>> For example, drivers/base/core.c contains
>>
>> #define to_root_device(dev) container_of(dev, struct root_device, dev)
>>
>> which works fine as long as the 'to_root_device' macro is always
>> applied to a variable called 'dev', as it is the case in the current
>> kernel sources. However, it breaks as soon as it gets applied to a
>> variable of any other name, as the name of the variable is also
>> substituted into the third argument of the 'container_of' macro, which
>> really should stay 'dev' in the above case.
>>
>> This patch renames the real macro arguments in all 5 such constructs
>> found by git-grep -E '#define.*container_of *\( *([^ ,]+) *,.*, *\1 *\)',
>> which may have missed some similar dangerous constructs, of course.
>> So these changes probably cross all possible boundaries of responsibility,
>> and I do not know how to best handle it, suggestions welcome.
>>
>> Btw. this dangerous idom is also popularised by the excellent Linux Device
>> Drivers book (3rd edition, chapter 14, bottom of page 383).
>>
>> ...
>>
>> -#define EVT_TO_HPET_DEV(evt) container_of(evt, struct hpet_dev, evt)
>> +#define EVT_TO_HPET_DEV(evtdev) container_of(evtdev, struct hpet_dev, evt)
>
> There is no reason whatsoever for implementing these things as macros
> and for the life of me I don't understand why people do this.
>
> If we're going to fix these things then how about we turn them into
> C functions thereby making them even safer?
>
> y:/usr/src/linux-2.6.31> grep -r 'define.*container_of' . | wc -l
> 347
Quite a bunch, but if deemed useful and acceptable, I'm willing to
convert them into static (inline?) functions as a means of thanking
the kernel developer community. But that surely wouldn't fly as a
single patch.
--
Feri.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-14 8:27 Ferenc Wagner
2009-09-17 5:41 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-17 12:53 ` Ferenc Wagner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ab0tybo9.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu \
--to=wferi@niif.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome