From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264286AbTLAVoL (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:44:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264296AbTLAVoL (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:44:11 -0500 Received: from dci.doncaster.on.ca ([66.11.168.194]:22713 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264286AbTLAVoJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:44:09 -0500 To: Samuel Flory Cc: Greg Stark , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: libata in 2.4.24? References: <3FCB8312.3050703@rackable.com> <87fzg4ckej.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv> <3FCBB15F.7050505@rackable.com> In-Reply-To: <3FCBB15F.7050505@rackable.com> From: Greg Stark Organization: The Emacs Conspiracy; member since 1992 Date: 01 Dec 2003 16:44:07 -0500 Message-ID: <87ad6ccixk.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Samuel Flory writes: > What chipset are you using? Assumming that hda is your sata drive. What are > the results of the following "hdarm -t /dev/hda" "hdparm -dvi /dev/hda" The > ICH5 chipset is the only chipset I've found that works well without libata. Ah, my motherboard is in fact an ICH5 I believe. Incidentally my kernel is actually 2.4.23-pre4. Is there any documentation about what libata is and what it does differently from the stock kernel? Why is it being developed separately instead of as a set of new drivers in the kernel like normal? -- greg