From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, rrichter@marvell.com,
linuxarm@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] EDAC/ghes: Add EDAC device for recording the CPU error count
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 19:33:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87b00978-8d5d-1917-b801-e6a36f704fb3@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201105174233.1146-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com>
Hi Shiju,
On 05/11/2020 17:42, Shiju Jose wrote:
> For the firmware-first error handling on ARM64 hardware platforms,
> CPU cache corrected error count is not recorded.
> Create an CPU EDAC device and device blocks for the CPU caches
> for this purpose. The EDAC device blocks are created based on the
> CPU caches information represented in the ACPI PPTT.
Using the PPTT won't work on x86 systems. Can we use the core-code's common data to learn
about caches: struct cpu_cacheinfo and struct cacheinfo ?
Thanks,
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-06 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-05 17:42 Shiju Jose
2020-11-05 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] ACPI: PPTT: Fix for a high level cache node detected in the low level Shiju Jose
2020-11-06 19:33 ` James Morse
2020-11-09 12:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-09 15:59 ` Shiju Jose
2020-11-05 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI: PPTT: Add function acpi_find_cache_info Shiju Jose
2020-11-05 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] EDAC/ghes: Add EDAC device for the CPU caches Shiju Jose
2020-11-05 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] ACPI / APEI: Add reporting ARM64 CPU cache corrected error count Shiju Jose
2020-11-06 19:33 ` James Morse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87b00978-8d5d-1917-b801-e6a36f704fb3@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rrichter@marvell.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome