From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933153AbdBVPtw (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:49:52 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52694 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932452AbdBVPtn (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:49:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM TSS cleanups and speedups To: Andy Lutomirski References: <245433d4-8039-5dc6-aef8-5611bc9b604d@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , kvm list , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Garnier , Jim Mattson From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <87bdcd55-b6c2-257f-e3f8-eea7223d26bb@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:25:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/02/2017 16:17, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> I pushed and tagged before seeing this v2. :( The differences seem to >> be x86-only, so I suppose Ingo can handle them if you resubmit. >> > I renamed the helpers to make it less likely that someone would repeat > my little buglet. I can submit a patch that just has the differences, > but I think it should go in through your tree. Would that work? That's fine for me as long as it is for Ingo. :) Paolo