From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7B8F36D4FC for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2026 22:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788645611; cv=none; b=mIB9zUARz0rNPIOmpnwtXMJ0AwQHEzm7pAyZka7S2RJSYo9l2Ka2SEQzdFC1Ix0wtX9QNZcg2Dys7KoOCvturtTkEAc454QYYDDbSnvXY+AiXQPyhWv7J4FsrnCAsckv7aaMITAcD7LqyeRSTa/CsFKdnp+To/62mLYoNEULSdk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788645611; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8HYgZ8ZgxawoVMyKOgFwItMt5JpraBiDnJuGrppbSDg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D5ni5wz7bImnnBWnJCzXhm2UzEsatkPuMKSsN2NJRjgyrpJrbmKt9eeE6llfQ2cKB8EBzWxA9WC40KMXTRCzXC6eCgpXlX+12fdhnOqH7CQPhvKPptvsDnLfBA9QTtrWxbL5FmzYYTSP6Y0cley8zKJ4z5pexXO9j5YldNCFVMw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=eGeJoYBO; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=y9U3PNYf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="eGeJoYBO"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="y9U3PNYf" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1788645606; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8NhmJThPSMPRUR+LcHYg6FIZCVHPmiiEIMERd1C9NtI=; b=eGeJoYBOfsZkxYRFUxnnC96ReQ3gJr11cV4JDwHEHHvar1v0yhSjDvc66hzpGCHELz6WPi hiXg+Zd3K3plwSr6SaZCxgahjtT49J+XG5Sntd18yTXyEdFoyA8EgpF2aLWMzHkr0FFBiP KDLA9eSbkmv9cKrDKHvYorTlvlyVuAIMnFc7+i1LM69iJmqAdOudM79eyJ1t0HcA1y0c98 q508d973jODtqiP9wSzQV5qUqRK+o5U9csMqhBES6C/0Hy1dCfOjAt5EfsYlNm51Zgr8ro 07XLqnJMEQ/K6EjFdmq6IQ0YiDFJYsCazuZ6qx0U1BXY6LZmkgiPT8cTK0wiyA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1788645606; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8NhmJThPSMPRUR+LcHYg6FIZCVHPmiiEIMERd1C9NtI=; b=y9U3PNYf0vbdGeJHL4Q+AoGB11W4Pw2utr9/6hK4/loMvUJ+FpcYrYew+/103yTD2DlGc6 FFprNTTHtkw302Cw== To: Bradley Morgan , liushugao@xiaomi.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, frederic@kernel.org, isaacmanjarres@google.com, lingyue@xiaomi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, weipengliang@xiaomi.com, wengjinfei@xiaomi.com, xiongliang@xiaomi.com, zhangjiawei8@xiaomi.com, zhukaiqian@xiaomi.com Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?5Zue5aSNOg==?= [External Mail][PATCH] tick/broadcast: Plug clockevents replacement race In-Reply-To: <4FDB69E5-7DEE-43CE-A66A-23A2D8DC987C@mainlining.org> References: <20361A3E-0D14-4CC5-946E-D75244CB4A45@mainlining.org> <87h5k34cob.ffs@fw13> <4FDB69E5-7DEE-43CE-A66A-23A2D8DC987C@mainlining.org> Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:00:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87bjab4avu.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, Sep 05 2026 at 22:24, Bradley Morgan wrote: > On 5 September 2026 22:21:24 BST, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>On Thu, Sep 03 2026 at 16:12, Bradley Morgan wrote: >>> Hi, I have a pixel 7, if I could be asked to backport this, then I'll be >>> happy to, for the fix, add: >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan >> >>It would be helpful to respond to the actual patch and not to some >>arbitrary reply. That way you might avoid your tags to be overseen by >>tools. >> > Sorry my mail client sometimes glitches, I fail to see how your mail client is responsible for you to hit reply on the wrong mail. But what do I know about all these new fangled mail clients who decide on their own what to do. When this happens to me I'm 100% confident that _I_ got it wrong and not my mail client. Maybe I'm just too old-school. Thanks, tglx