From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E46C10DCE for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFE02073C for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727302AbgCYBOA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:14:00 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:46700 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727119AbgCYBOA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:14:00 -0400 Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jGuHy-0000My-WD; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:52:59 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A272100C51; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:52:58 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Xiaoyao Li , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , hpa@zytor.com, Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Arvind Sankar , Fenghua Yu , Tony Luck , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Jim Mattson Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection In-Reply-To: <02ff2436-340c-540a-86b8-fa5f4ff7bb3b@intel.com> References: <20200315050517.127446-1-xiaoyao.li@intel.com> <20200315050517.127446-2-xiaoyao.li@intel.com> <87zhc7ovhj.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87lfnqq0oo.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87tv2edp1a.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <02ff2436-340c-540a-86b8-fa5f4ff7bb3b@intel.com> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:52:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87blolz251.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Xiaoyao Li writes: > On 3/24/2020 6:29 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> - switch (sld_state) { >> + switch (state) { >> case sld_off: >> pr_info("disabled\n"); >> - break; >> - >> + return; > Here, when sld_off, it just returns without > setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT). > > So for APs, it won't clear SLD bit in split_lock_init(). Trivial fix: static void split_lock_init(void) { split_lock_verify_msr(sld_state != sld_off); } You just need to remove the __init annotation from split_lock_verify_msr(). Thanks, tglx