From: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Nishad Kamdar" <nishadkamdar@gmail.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
"Christian Lütke-Stetzkamp" <christian@lkamp.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "John Crispin" <blogic@openwrt.org>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: mt7621-mmc: Fix single statement macros in sd.c
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:29:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bm8lhtzh.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f93ac5324ef3a229f2b8e855222a5fdd7b32f90.camel@perches.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2863 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 25 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 20:49 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 06:31:32AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2018-09-23 at 15:08 +0530, Nishad Kamdar wrote:
>> > > This patch fixes a few single statement macros in sd.c.
>> > > It converts two macros to inline functions. It removes
>> > > five other macros and replaces their usages with calls to
>> > > the function being called in the macro definition.
>> > > Issue found by checkpatch.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@gmail.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > Changes in v2:
>> > > - Convert msdc_gate_clk() and msdc_ungate_clk() to inline functions.
>> > > - Delete msdc_irq_restore(), msdc_vcore_on(), msdc_vcore_off(),
>> > > msdc_vdd_on() and msdc_vdd_off() and replace their usages directly
>> > > with calls to the function being called by these macros.
>> >
>> > Nishad, do please look again for uses of these functions
>> > you are changing.
>> >
>> > Please try removing all the #if 0 blocks instead, and then
>> > see if there are also now unused functions from those removed
>> > blocks that could also be removed.
>> >
>> > And Greg, if you look at this, look at the odd license of
>> > these files.
>> >
>> > It's possible the license is incompatible with the GPL.
>>
>> It is odd, but the GPL at the bottom of the file kind of implies it is
>> ok.
>
> Implications are not licenses.
>
>> Given that it was published by mtk, I am assuming all is good, but
>> it would be a good idea to check with the authors to fix this up
>> properly.
>
> The initial patch was submitted by
> John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Actually it was submitted by me. I extracted it from libreCMC (I think -
it is in most of the various openWRT-like distros).
In libreCMC the patch has John listed as the Author, and I thought it
right to preserve that.
I believe the code comes from a code-dump made by Mediatek several years
ago. It can be found at git://github.com/mqmaker/linux.git.
The code there contains (in drivers/mmc/host/mtk-mmc/sd.c) both the
copyright statement and the
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
declaration.
I took this declaration as sufficient evidence that Mediatek
intentionally released it under the GPL. The fact that the whole
code dump contains the GPL COPYING file is extra evidence.
NeilBrown
>
> I do not know John's relationship to mediatek.
>
> commit 8b634a9c7620b15691322cd53071122d2ab249a7
> Author: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
> Date: Thu Mar 15 07:22:35 2018 +1100
>
> John? Any idea of the providence of these files?
>
> I do not see anything like it in
> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=tree;f=target/linux/mediatek;h=ad50ab7e407372a482aafb4183c4e49e25f93739;hb=refs/tags/v18.06.1
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-26 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-23 9:38 Nishad Kamdar
2018-09-23 13:31 ` Joe Perches
2018-09-25 16:17 ` Nishad Kamdar
2018-09-25 18:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-09-25 19:01 ` Joe Perches
2018-09-26 2:29 ` NeilBrown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bm8lhtzh.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neil@brown.name \
--cc=blogic@openwrt.org \
--cc=christian@lkamp.de \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishadkamdar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome