From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753927Ab2JDBYJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 21:24:09 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:42537 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752777Ab2JDBYE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 21:24:04 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Thomas Lendacky , kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, avi@redhat.com, Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support In-Reply-To: <506C192E.5060700@redhat.com> References: <87vces2gxq.fsf__45058.6618776017$1349247807$gmane$org@rustcorp.com.au> <506C192E.5060700@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 09:41:12 +0930 Message-ID: <87bogj2j1b.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > Il 03/10/2012 08:44, Rusty Russell ha scritto: >> There's a reason I haven't done this. I really, really dislike "my >> implemention isn't broken" feature bits. We could have an infinite >> number of them, for each bug in each device. > > However, this bug affects (almost) all implementations and (almost) all > devices. It even makes sense to reserve a transport feature bit for it > instead of a device feature bit. > > Paolo Perhaps, but we have to fix the bugs first! As I said, my torture patch broke qemu immediately. Since noone has leapt onto fixing that, I'll take a look now... Cheers, Rusty.