From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from layka.disroot.org (layka.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B8B034EF05; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 14:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792162012; cv=none; b=vFn2FWeNq6Dj8nRIlNenkXXd0M2YCdET50Yry+7/Ub3mOjTUpC01kc74x3jn3KGtsu4Ieu0tpo8ntA5F1ubmARjoU+oxsNIaMql9WqWZLoWHhiwIXYs7zGsxHikrvZT66OqTjixqrcSVCfRF2Cq4EFsFHa22OPvhr9YWfYKOwgc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792162012; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eXJ3xKLCZxlKqKZKNob+04rGEdx4IpyxWqc+ruQwW90=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=qsBPqTPsvrUXpgR7saG2AowzWwIWJAJga8Q62qYYY17krxKisrSSGoYTK9er57ISbOPpnWq1fgZYl44hHtdqnLXyM1wzE0zaEmXYwYAKL7xcJNRmLw7ttPbkhcn9ZcFTxWjDLAEQcutWXfIKZsDHLh/n0qIcKDT8Jg0x+uAhYgc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b=I0Zb1xQD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b="I0Zb1xQD" Received: from mail01.layka.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B29C82B6A; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:46:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id ejefj459Rafv; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:46:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1792162007; bh=eXJ3xKLCZxlKqKZKNob+04rGEdx4IpyxWqc+ruQwW90=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To; b=I0Zb1xQDXSOmVX9Kt6UYmVl8ebI547S78TXhZBSV1FE7eNu+tB0FCaGnlInm11Z1h F8QWwm3ED0X7b1heqwXB1Ytv1boXBy9zFSvrFzdCSI9VvMKaVTawQg13BiPDv3oYWZ A2ujhLwCN4Z559Kahxu6OUszf2eWMtLq2ZsTw5/Atu3KIT7AnoAc+7AbALOpR+ytX2 QWrSKZZ2xsZxWMIjafD6FC/iC2bzomAXD/56GGGVEO+ZwSd7e7ZFQwZZgSzttUQD2Z vLX+T9OS94T+yYmu+QC/Zo2+toLAIazwGplBvhjNd6OsGkGZqv6/xiT7v+UmK5ZSUV P/RmXLGHPMizQ== Message-ID: <87c6cc21-dc1d-4d76-95e5-7cca12ce0930@disroot.org> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:46:47 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Betterbird (Linux) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Support HP OmniBook 7 Laptop 16-bh0xxx From: Sven Jans To: Takashi Iwai , Jon Harrison Cc: david.rhodes@cirrus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com, perex@perex.cz, rf@opensource.cirrus.com, tiwai@suse.com References: <87a4od3f4f.wl-tiwai@suse.de> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 16/10/2026 16:42, Sven wrote: > On 16/10/2026 16:16, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:15:24 +0200, >> Jon Harrison wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2026, Stefan Binding wrote: >>>> We are currently awaiting confirmation of the correct settings >>>> before we do >>>> so. >>> >>> I have another HP OmniBook 7 Laptop 16-bh0xxx, SKU D2KR6UA#ABA, >>> BIOS F.12, subsystem 103c:8e60, running Linux 7.2.5. Both CS35L41 >>> amplifiers still fail to probe: >>> >>>    cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.0: Failed property >>> cirrus,dev-index: -22 >>>    cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.0: error -EINVAL: Platform >>> not supported >>> >>> The speakers only play through the Realtek fallback and are very quiet. >>> Has that settings confirmation arrived, and is there an expected time >>> for the quirk? >> >> OK, we've waited enough long, so I take the patch to for-next branch >> now (for 7.4-rc1). >> >> If this is really breaking something, let me know.  We'll fix up again >> before 7.4 release. >> >> >> thanks, >> >> Takashi > > Hello, > I saw the commit in tiwai/sound. I noticed that 3900 was used for the > boost_peak_milliamp value. I just wanted to note that as far as I can > remember that is the value that the Windows driver uses, while the > malformed but readable _DSD specifies 4500 (at least mine does). I don't > know which one is correct, but 3900 is probably on the safer side I guess. Small correction, 3850 mA to be precise.