From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
Cc: perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de,
baijiaju1990@gmail.com, jjzuming@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ALSA: pcm: Drain proc callbacks at device disconnect
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 15:40:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cxt0a61z.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pm-pmb-2439c851f82c443c3600-v7-2774a482b7f03e1fef60@gmail.com>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2026 12:58:20 +0200,
Cen Zhang wrote:
>
> Disconnecting an individual PCM leaves its proc files accessible until
> snd_pcm_free_stream(). HDA codec-only sysfs unbind can take this path
> while the controller and card remain registered. An open proc file pins
> the card module, but does not hold a codec PCM reference.
>
> With CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PROCFS, a prealloc write is buffered until file
> release. Without an attached PCM runtime, its release can replace the
> DMA buffer after final PCM cleanup has already freed the preallocation:
>
> HDA codec unbind prealloc file release
> ---------------- ---------------------
> hda_codec_driver_remove()
> snd_hda_codec_disconnect_pcms()
> snd_device_disconnect()
> snd_pcm_dev_disconnect()
> /* proc nodes remain */
> snd_hda_codec_cleanup_for_unbind()
> codec_release_pcms()
> snd_device_free()
> snd_pcm_free()
> free preallocated buffer
> snd_info_text_entry_release()
> snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_proc_write()
> replace DMA buffer
> remove stream proc nodes
> free substream
>
> The later proc rundown can itself invoke this buffered write and leave
> the replacement allocation without a final free. A concurrent release
> can also overlap the earlier buffer cleanup.
>
> Extract snd_info_disconnect_entry() from snd_info_free_entry() to remove
> proc nodes and drain callbacks without freeing the info entry objects.
> Use it for both stream directions at PCM disconnect. Finish the existing
> PCM state and device disconnection under open_mutex, then drop that lock
> before proc rundown: even an otherwise idle proc file can run its
> buffered release callback, which takes open_mutex, during proc_remove().
>
> Keep entry ownership and final cleanup unchanged, including the saved
> OSS child entries. As with existing info entry teardown, callers must
> serialize registration with disconnection and release.
>
> Suggested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
Applied now. Although we still may have some issues about the
concurrent codec release and probe, this should be treated better in
the upper layer.
thanks,
Takashi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 10:58 Cen Zhang
2026-10-23 13:40 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cxt0a61z.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=jjzuming@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®