From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19BA142FCBE for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 16:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790872800; cv=none; b=bCtHzjABlF1Obq6N/wxtpkUtgZWaLpDzPtB7ex4O9lycIEe2XYgy1L43rvu/LtFaY4xD4tFaKFzyu7t3PSQUI7TjLn4d1vgxEpYayPY+jCWkSr6Tc+95woXt2gbjctd7LOHaPVG0kXcRlsiHvMXk3UzEyChHiZ+vpwuR9cqQmJc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790872800; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s6+tQTA7eM+scFpAMzrbaCGiLe0m1KsihrjpBh2oaWA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hHQhGxHDjC2fXgZYlkHThy1cLUUEqr+uGk+LskCfYpFnGoX0Ku6BuM/BhtMvPHw0DNBUPKW1bcUFhgGZPJrzSvjGHv0HgD8eYp2lmV25Snfzrmv/Zg6vCHLS+u/SgVUujuLairv0RMScZ5Rt/p0iXwwDj3cIGkaO7jaT4u7iNho= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=ZUWSwCH5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="ZUWSwCH5" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD6B4E4153C; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A7836035C; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 2D8161032813A; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 18:39:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1790872795; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=zqO9wZAcpr/Xip1m0ECW+JKX9OkInYFz8R6jGpSZpwc=; b=ZUWSwCH5hIeRSW7iJp9LnRx2eQDRD3Pe7PvVf9XdlfTJcI6x3efnRyLVl0HbRxMAr+Eire 372cp3SSp/9MJ4MqhrNjQrN/acJcaWJQEeKMF154bO8xwXZnzVqqVSCvG9EPofv7JRjo1S Ghb0hKezKZsTSbg+MhGwkm+v56UMSz2zVy9nsE22oqqhrQ0b09Bx9KNLydaJIe4B/ecG5Z b0b2o9/e1t2zY8N6wpOlW/QWLnlbi8loSAuFizHeYVSA1VddXNS4BB09dG+vVVwOU4TtNN r+WBC7sXq735w3W29MIbyh3Zh06u4Us1g2/DJ7vrYatZDu0iXKNZ3TW9Gywbpg== From: Miquel Raynal To: Mark Brown Cc: Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Michael Walle , Takahiro Kuwano , Pratyush Yadav , Steam Lin , Santhosh Kumar K Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] spi: spi-mem/mtd: spinand: Prevent SPI NAND continuous reads on am65/am62 In-Reply-To: <38290328-a562-4813-a9e0-2fafaa3874c7@sirena.org.uk> (Mark Brown's message of "Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:08:47 +0100") References: <20260326-winbond-v7-0-rc1-cadence-cont-read-v1-0-0d626e1dfb2b@bootlin.com> <878qa7dzke.fsf@bootlin.com> <87mrt177km.fsf@bootlin.com> <38290328-a562-4813-a9e0-2fafaa3874c7@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.12; emacs 30.2 Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 18:39:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87cxttml2j.fsf@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hi Mark, >> It seems like the spi bits have not been applied, can you check if you >> can still apply them? Without these, people using this controller with >> continuous read capable devices may observe spurious issues hard to >> debug (due to the CS possibly not being kept asserted during long reads, >> leading to the continuous read being cancelled by the SPI NAND). > > No, they don't apply to even v7.3-rc1. I didn't see the immutable > branch mentioned in: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/1FyLxEwWqNFzX@sirena.co.uk > > yet? In theory you should have received a request to merge the immutable mtd/spi-mem-cont-read-for-7.2 tag some time ago: Subject: [GIT PULL] spi-nand/spi-mem changes for 7.2 Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 17:17:42 +0200 But that's not a big deal, I will rebase the remaining SPI and resend ;) Thanks! Miqu=C3=A8l