From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CCEC7618B for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230259AbjCNRbl (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:31:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47006 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230211AbjCNRbh (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:31:37 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B191AA189B; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:73::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E87E44A; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:31:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 1E87E44A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1678815094; bh=gYung32wzcYpcSnwNv3MGdrXpgDOHF4vq1SMadpeIsk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=QyUiFDLvX+lQjLi+JBSZF5E+D8pdb2jLETCOkDYoDtDQA7sYbroRHY9xAUAJrlLpf 7/Vg3Mf2XUAwL2drzu5qcIN2Ps+Zg8unCZPJitXDCsVJmdn1EzmFA2Et8jQNQxFMEZ yqzbjcQ3DvmpP1IPpVvzaM5OeQdwnhwcHiTm5BJBLT89XN47kZqbmliOyRzroiYQai QtbwmvGTcKhZQvfokE0q8ckBTzZALhypon214ox+HCL+WlAyGdCjRuJVHQtTcEYWo3 9GG4S6lL8rjDowSPP2sb9Xjew4L78ht6vsjwU5mFG2Ezs964ZeLZTmdUuGXlgWYX38 hrHXj2Os3V+hA== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Xujun Leng Cc: linux@leemhuis.info, lengxujun2007@126.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: process: submitting-patches: fix typo in section "Respond to review comments" In-Reply-To: <20230312071423.3042-1-lengxujun2007@126.com> References: <20230312071423.3042-1-lengxujun2007@126.com> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:31:33 -0600 Message-ID: <87cz5btf2i.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Xujun Leng writes: > In the second paragraph of section "Respond to review comments", there is > a spelling mistake: "aganst" should be "against". > > Signed-off-by: Xujun Leng > --- > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > index eac7167dce83..69ce64e03c70 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ for their time. Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and > reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond > politely and address the problems they have pointed out. When sending a next > version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches > -explaining difference aganst previous submission (see > +explaining difference against previous submission (see > :ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`). Applied, thanks. jon