From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C798C7618F for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A13F21849 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389858AbfGRQl6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:41:58 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:51724 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726040AbfGRQl5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:41:57 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x6IGas38068926 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:41:56 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tttqt4urf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:41:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e34.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:41:55 +0100 Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.15) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:41:50 +0100 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x6IGfmwM34341242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:41:49 GMT Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B510CC6057; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:41:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8093CC6095; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:41:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain (unknown [9.85.186.82]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:41:44 +0000 (GMT) References: <20190718032858.28744-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190718032858.28744-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190718084456.GE24562@lst.de> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: x86@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Alexey Dobriyan , Thomas Lendacky , Halil Pasic , Mike Anderson , Ram Pai Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function In-reply-to: <20190718084456.GE24562@lst.de> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:41:25 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19071816-0016-0000-0000-000009D1B85B X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011452; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000287; SDB=6.01234001; UDB=6.00650264; IPR=6.01015328; MB=3.00027782; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-07-18 16:41:55 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19071816-0017-0000-0000-00004412E0B8 Message-Id: <87d0i747nu.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-07-18_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=989 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907180174 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig writes: >> -/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */ >> -bool sev_active(void) >> -{ >> - return is_prot_virt_guest(); >> -} >> - >> bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev) >> { >> - return sev_active(); >> + return is_prot_virt_guest(); >> } > > Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted? > > Otherwise looks good: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Thank you for your review on al these patches. -- Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center