mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>,
	Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com>,
	Selvan Mani <smani@micron.com>,
	Sam Bradshaw <sbradshaw@micron.com>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul McKenney" <paul.mckenney@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic percpu refcounting
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:05:09 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2s1rowi.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370039205-14071-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com>

Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> writes:

> This implements a refcount with similar semantics to
> atomic_get()/atomic_dec_and_test() - but percpu.
>
> It also implements two stage shutdown, as we need it to tear down the
> percpu counts.  Before dropping the initial refcount, you must call
> percpu_ref_kill(); this puts the refcount in "shutting down mode" and
> switches back to a single atomic refcount with the appropriate barriers
> (synchronize_rcu()).
>
> It's also legal to call percpu_ref_kill() multiple times - it only returns
> true once, so callers don't have to reimplement shutdown synchronization.

> +static inline void percpu_ref_get(struct percpu_ref *ref)
> +{
> +	unsigned __percpu *pcpu_count;
> +
> +	preempt_disable();
> +
> +	pcpu_count = ACCESS_ONCE(ref->pcpu_count);
> +
> +	if (likely(REF_STATUS(pcpu_count) == PCPU_REF_PTR))
> +		__this_cpu_inc(*pcpu_count);
> +	else
> +		atomic_inc(&ref->count);
> +
> +	preempt_enable();
> +}

I think this should be rcu_read_lock(), which is currently equivalent
but theoretically different.

Does your percpu_ref_kill() *really* need to be nonblocking?  (I'd have
to read your other patches which use this to be sure).  Otherwise, just
use synchronize_rcu(), and get rid of the release function...

Cheers,
Rusty.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-05  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-31 22:26 Kent Overstreet
2013-06-03 22:39 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-03 23:02 ` [PATCH] percpu-refcount: Don't use silly cmpxchg() Kent Overstreet
2013-06-03 23:09   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05  7:35 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2013-06-05  7:44   ` [PATCH] Generic percpu refcounting Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d2s1rowi.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=asamymuthupa@micron.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=koverstreet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sbradshaw@micron.com \
    --cc=smani@micron.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zab@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®