From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:28:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:27:53 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.134.213.6]:1043 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:27:42 -0400 To: Ulrich.Lauther@mchp.siemens.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.2 bug in handling vfat? In-Reply-To: <200104102022.f3AKM8Q03806@emma.mchp.siemens.de> From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: 12 Apr 2001 00:27:23 +0900 In-Reply-To: <200104102022.f3AKM8Q03806@emma.mchp.siemens.de> Message-ID: <87d7ajzcbo.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Hi, I think that it is the bug of FAT-fs. Please try the following patch. Thanks -- OGAWA Hirofumi --=-=-= Content-Type: application/octet-stream Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=fat-2.4.3.diff.gz Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 H4sICDZ21DoAA2ZhdC0yLjQuMy5kaWZmAIWNQWuDMACFz+ZXvMtAG6MxtummFdw/GGywo0iNa6Da YiKr/fWL68H1MJpLwvve99LotgUbhzccdT9emIjWURqdBv0VtyZuaxt32uyj/V98Twhj7IHsfaoG 7+oMSHCZ8W0mXiA454RS+v+y93EY8XoekAhwniVOe561hJQlWLrh4RZ0viTKksDTvUVTT+Gk6iHs j9X87k69PeQEDo+9vrjMKrACZjKVvUb2WnXue6vMtzJ2JXlOmKdb+AtvjLW6UwEWnxZIJee32dVM UcBf+BMkD2JBfX8JYxfdAHY7bALqVLhz15lX55ZY/7aSJMjJD1vXZKiiAQAA --=-=-=--