From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: 徐福海 <xufuhai1992@gmail.com>,
shuah@kernel.org, "Thomas Renninger" <trenn@suse.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lishujin@kuaishou.com, xufuhai <xufuhai@kuaishou.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpupower: Fix amd cpu (family < 0x17) active state issue
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:26:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87e43451-e7d3-877e-7081-92838ae699e6@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <378e58d3-5300-1179-44bb-bc2b42a3beb0@gmail.com>
On 4/19/21 8:27 PM, 徐福海 wrote:
> From: xufuhai<xufuhai@kuaishou.com>
>
> For the old AMD processor (family < 0x17), cpupower will call the
> amd_pci_get_num_boost_states function, but for the non-root user
> pci_read_byte function (implementation comes from the psutil library),
> val will be set to 0xff, indicating that there is no read function
> callback. At this time, the original logic will set the cpupower turbo
> active state to yes. This is an obvious issue~
>
> Reproduce procedure:
> cpupower frequency-info
>
> Reported-by: yangrui<yangrui@kuaishou.com>
> Signed-off-by: xufuhai<xufuhai@kuaishou.com>
Also your Signed-off-by should match the from address.
There is a mismatch between the two.
> Signed-off-by: chenguanqiao<chenguanqiao@kuaishou.com>
> Signed-off-by: lishujin<lishujin@kuaishou.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Renninger<trenn@suse.com>
> ---
> tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c
> index 97f2c857048e..6f9504906afa 100644
> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c
> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,13 @@ int amd_pci_get_num_boost_states(int *active, int *states)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> val = pci_read_byte(device, 0x15c);
> +
> + /* If val is 0xff, meaning has no permisson to
> + * get the boost states, return -1
> + */
> + if (val == 0xff)
> + return -1;
> +
> if (val & 3)
> *active = 1;
> else
> --
> 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)
>
I am seeing two patches with the same commit summary,
should these two be a singles patch?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/6e35df20-753a-6c9c-8786-3fc87cdd17ba@gmail.com/
Please combine the two and send single patch if they fix the
same problem. If not, please change the commit log to reflect
the difference.
thanks,
-- Shuah
next parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-23 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bf312780-dda7-d08f-6098-1d8a7d4044e4@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <378e58d3-5300-1179-44bb-bc2b42a3beb0@gmail.com>
2021-04-23 22:26 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2021-04-25 2:41 ` 徐福海
[not found] <35ab0d0a-f9ce-b4d7-cd85-3cd8a8638ab6@gmail.com>
2021-03-29 3:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpupower: fix " xufuhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87e43451-e7d3-877e-7081-92838ae699e6@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lishujin@kuaishou.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.com \
--cc=xufuhai1992@gmail.com \
--cc=xufuhai@kuaishou.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®