From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C9CC33CB7 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D2624125 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="GKmrRVPG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726026AbgA0QuL (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:50:11 -0500 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:60100 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725845AbgA0QuK (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:50:10 -0500 Received: from [10.137.112.111] (unknown [131.107.147.111]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A12F2008819; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:50:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 3A12F2008819 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1580143810; bh=7k4I5TR6svwojaafQlq2biwEquSFHairvhblaQP/HX4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GKmrRVPGRylTaUJkzQQYSUjlQYpJi+TeRZLqPRe5/kYiU3QKImNBE6fnHhOuIrhz6 c8KTLy1ZkhIW5srFxoJp0y200Nl+ibnTEywdcpeeR2kahsTs8LkNeLMJCs7FeqvXjg Bfbb7p6lni2I+PKKYGD5fEFWPuLw5mcgbLkwKxm4= Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based on different TPM banks To: Mimi Zohar , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jerry Snitselaar , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1580140919-6127-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> <1580140919-6127-2-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian Message-ID: <87e6b531-3596-4523-a6b0-629ae8fd6995@linux.microsoft.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:50:31 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1580140919-6127-2-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/27/2020 8:01 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > + > + for (i = 0; i < ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) { > + if (ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id == d.alg_id) > + break; > + } > + > + if (i == ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks) > + d.alg_id = ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[0].alg_id; > + Can the number of allocated banks (ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks) be zero? Should that be checked before accessing "allocated_banks"? -lakshmi