From: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@163.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] mm/shmem: make SGP_NOALLOC succeed on hole like SGP_READ
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 16:14:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efc5ef-9fef-4cfb-a129-bf8ca373683d@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <772f7bcb-eb78-4439-b94b-1a096a01dc51@linux.alibaba.com>
On 5/25/26 3:10 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 5/20/26 6:15 PM, Chi Zhiling wrote:
>> From: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> Change SGP_NOALLOC to return 0 with NULL folio on hole, matching
>> SGP_READ behavior. This simplifies the sgp_type handling by unifying
>> hole semantics across these types.
>>
>> Previously, SGP_NOALLOC returned -ENOENT on hole, while SGP_READ
>> returned 0. This inconsistency required special handling in callers
>> like khugepaged and userfaultfd.
>
> This patch doesn't seem to be a performance optimization, and I'm not
> convinced.
Hi, baolin
This is not an optimization patch, and it is not related to this patch
series either.
>
>> After this change:
>> - khugepaged: behavior unchanged (checks both error and NULL folio)
>
> But this adds an extra check to khugepaged, and I'm not sure it's worth it.
You are right, I will drop this patch in v2.
>
>> - userfaultfd: behavior unchanged (both -ENOENT and NULL are converted
>> to -EFAULT before returning to userspace)
>
> No, this will break userfaultfd, cause userfaultfd currently returns an
> error code directly in this case (please update to the latest
> codebase.). See:
>
> static struct folio *shmem_get_folio_noalloc(struct inode *inode,
> pgoff_t pgoff)
> {
> struct folio *folio;
> int err;
>
> err = shmem_get_folio(inode, pgoff, 0, &folio, SGP_NOALLOC);
> if (err)
> return ERR_PTR(err);
>
> return folio;
> }
The return value of shmem_get_folio_noalloc() will change, but it seems
this does not affect the logic in mfill_atomic_pte_continue().
```
folio = ops->get_folio_noalloc(inode, pgoff);
/* Our caller expects us to return -EFAULT if we failed to find folio */
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(folio))
return -EFAULT;
```
No matter whether get_folio_noalloc() returns an error or NULL, the
error code is converted to -EFAULT here, and mfill_atomic_pte_continue()
is currently the only caller of get_folio_noalloc().
Did I miss something?
Thanks,
>
>> Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>> include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 2 +-
>> mm/khugepaged.c | 2 +-
>> mm/shmem.c | 9 +++------
>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
>> index 93a0ba872ebe..d461713c095b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ extern unsigned long
>> shmem_partial_swap_usage(struct address_space *mapping,
>> /* Flag allocation requirements to shmem_get_folio */
>> enum sgp_type {
>> SGP_READ, /* don't exceed i_size, don't allocate page */
>> - SGP_NOALLOC, /* similar, but fail on hole or use fallocated
>> page */
>> + SGP_NOALLOC, /* like SGP_READ, but accept fallocated page */
>> SGP_CACHE, /* don't exceed i_size, may allocate page */
>> SGP_WRITE, /* may exceed i_size, may allocate !Uptodate page */
>> SGP_FALLOC, /* like SGP_WRITE, but make existing page
>> Uptodate */
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index b8452dbdb043..3309d1c094df 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_file(struct
>> mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
>> /* swap in or instantiate fallocated page */
>> if (shmem_get_folio(mapping->host, index, 0,
>> - &folio, SGP_NOALLOC)) {
>> + &folio, SGP_NOALLOC) || !folio) {
>> result = SCAN_FAIL;
>> goto xa_unlocked;
>> }
>> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
>> index 3b5dc21b323c..458853c506ea 100644
>> --- a/mm/shmem.c
>> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
>> @@ -2524,14 +2524,11 @@ static int shmem_get_folio_gfp(struct inode
>> *inode, pgoff_t index,
>> }
>> /*
>> - * SGP_READ: succeed on hole, with NULL folio, letting caller zero.
>> - * SGP_NOALLOC: fail on hole, with NULL folio, letting caller fail.
>> + * SGP_READ/SGP_NOALLOC: succeed on hole, with NULL folio.
>> */
>> *foliop = NULL;
>> - if (sgp == SGP_READ)
>> + if (sgp <= SGP_NOALLOC)
>> return 0;
>> - if (sgp == SGP_NOALLOC)
>> - return -ENOENT;
>> /*
>> * Fast cache lookup and swap lookup did not find it: allocate.
>> @@ -2657,7 +2654,7 @@ static int shmem_get_folio_gfp(struct inode
>> *inode, pgoff_t index,
>> *
>> * When no folio is found, the behavior depends on @sgp:
>> * - for SGP_READ, *@foliop is %NULL and 0 is returned
>> - * - for SGP_NOALLOC, *@foliop is %NULL and -ENOENT is returned
>> + * - for SGP_NOALLOC, *@foliop is %NULL and 0 is returned
>> * - for all other flags a new folio is allocated, inserted into the
>> * page cache and returned locked in @foliop.
>> *
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-25 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 10:15 [PATCH v1 0/5] mm/shmem: optimize read with reduced xarray lookups and folio batching Chi Zhiling
2026-05-20 10:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] mm/filemap: reduce unnecessary xarray lookups when read cached pages Chi Zhiling
2026-05-20 10:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] mm/filemap: reduce xarray lookups in filemap_get_folios_contig() Chi Zhiling
2026-05-20 10:15 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] mm/shmem: make SGP_NOALLOC succeed on hole like SGP_READ Chi Zhiling
2026-05-25 7:10 ` Baolin Wang
2026-05-25 8:14 ` Chi Zhiling [this message]
2026-05-25 8:44 ` Baolin Wang
2026-05-20 10:15 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] mm/shmem: introduce copy_zero_to_iter() for large zeroing Chi Zhiling
2026-05-20 10:15 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] mm/shmem: optimize file read with folio batching Chi Zhiling
2026-05-25 8:37 ` Baolin Wang
2026-05-25 9:47 ` Chi Zhiling
2026-05-26 3:11 ` Baolin Wang
2026-05-26 7:12 ` Chi Zhiling
2026-06-01 11:20 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-01 14:37 ` Chi Zhiling
2026-05-22 0:14 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] mm/shmem: optimize read with reduced xarray lookups and " Andrew Morton
2026-05-22 1:36 ` Chi Zhiling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87efc5ef-9fef-4cfb-a129-bf8ca373683d@163.com \
--to=chizhiling@163.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chizhiling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome