mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mpic IRQ_TYPE_BOTH handling
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 08:52:21 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efrs8y8q.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADtm3G6VVthsOX7d_LHNtFdCvw+oiku=ATL8J-cBHBpLTVrpyg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Gregory,

Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> In arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c , it looks like IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH is
> handled the same way as IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
>
> static unsigned int mpic_type_to_vecpri(struct mpic *mpic, unsigned int type)
> {
>         /* Now convert sense value */
>         switch(type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
>         case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
>                 return MPIC_INFO(VECPRI_SENSE_EDGE) |
>                        MPIC_INFO(VECPRI_POLARITY_POSITIVE);
>         case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
>         case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
>                 return MPIC_INFO(VECPRI_SENSE_EDGE) |
>                        MPIC_INFO(VECPRI_POLARITY_NEGATIVE);
>         case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
>                 return MPIC_INFO(VECPRI_SENSE_LEVEL) |
>                        MPIC_INFO(VECPRI_POLARITY_POSITIVE);
>         case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
>         default:
>                 return MPIC_INFO(VECPRI_SENSE_LEVEL) |
>                        MPIC_INFO(VECPRI_POLARITY_NEGATIVE);
>         }
> }
>
> If IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH is unsupported, shouldn't we be returning an
> error, instead of silently setting to use IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING?
> Something like the following (sorry if the diff wraps weirdly, on
> webmail at the moment):

I don't know this code so I asked Ben and he said something like
"PowerMacs never use BOTH, so it hasn't mattered, but Freescale machines
might".

So if you want to send a proper signed-off patch, and confirm that all
the callers can handle the error properly, then we can merge it.

cheers

> ----8<----
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
> index b9aac95..5867ea2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
> @@ -876,6 +876,9 @@ int mpic_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned
> int flow_type)
>         if (src >= mpic->num_sources)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> +       if (flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
>         vold = mpic_irq_read(src, MPIC_INFO(IRQ_VECTOR_PRI));
>
>         /* We don't support "none" type */
> ---->8----
>
> Thanks,
> Gregory

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-30 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-03  1:43 Gregory Fong
2017-08-30 22:52 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2017-09-06  9:34   ` Laurentiu Tudor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87efrs8y8q.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®