From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, <criu@openvz.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: add an ioctl to get an owning userns for a superblock
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 20:24:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efvwkwy7.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170511001526.GA7992@outlook.office365.com> (Andrei Vagin's message of "Wed, 10 May 2017 17:15:27 -0700")
Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com> writes:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 07:34:00PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Andrei Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> writes:
>>
>> > The introduced ioctl returns a file descriptor that refers to a owning
>> > user namespace for a superblock which is associated with a target file
>> > descriptor.
>> >
>> > EPERM is returned if the current process doesn't have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in
>> > the returned user namespace.
>> >
>> > This information is required to dump and restore mount namespaces. We
>> > need to know to which user namespace a superblock is belonged to.
>> >
>> > We already have the SIOCGSKNS ioctl for sockets to get a network
>> > namespace, so it looks reasonable to use the same interface for
>> > superblocks too.
>> >
>> > This functionality can be useful for users in order to understand
>> > a running system.
>>
>> This will probably work. And the capability check eases any concerns
>> I might have that this would be a trivial information leak.
>>
>> That said can we hold off just a little bit. If open_fs work actually
>> turns into a real interface that would seem to be the perfect place
>> to stick this functionality.
>
> Sure, we can. Do you know any place where to read more information about
> open_fs? I think I have heared a few times about this idea, but it would be
> good to get more details.
Look for David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> recent patches on lkml he
has implemented an initial rfc for it.
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-11 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-09 23:19 Andrei Vagin
2017-05-10 0:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-11 0:15 ` Andrei Vagin
2017-05-11 1:24 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87efvwkwy7.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=criu@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome