From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "kernel-hardening\@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev\@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Linker segfault on powerpc when CONFIG_LKDTM=y (was Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 3/5] lkdtm: add function for testing .rodata section)
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:12:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eg67ooe5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jL8UBfs7NjSgKOeqd9toRgtW3gPu53TPLbTMRJiwRUvPg@mail.gmail.com>
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
>>
>>> This adds a function that lives in the .rodata section. The section
>>> flags are corrected using objcopy since there is no way with gcc to
>>> declare section flags in an architecture-agnostic way.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/misc/Makefile | 7 +++++++
>>> drivers/misc/lkdtm.h | 6 ++++++
>>> drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>>> drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/lkdtm_rodata.c
>>
>> This is blowing up my linker :(
>>
>> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: line 52: 36260 Segmentation fault (core dumped) ${LD} ${LDFLAGS} ${LDFLAGS_vmlinux} -o ${2} -T ${lds} ${KBUILD_VMLINUX_INIT} --start-group ${KBUILD_VMLINUX_MAIN} --end-group ${1}
>>
>> Haven't had a chance to debug it further.
>
> Argh. Do you want a quick fix for this now? I can add a PPC CONFIG
> blacklist for the rodata check, maybe?
Nah that's OK, none of our defconfigs have it enabled so it's not a real
blocker. It also builds OK as a module - though I haven't tested the
result yet.
> Also, what version of gcc? I'll see if I can reproduce this with a
> cross compiler...
The original hit was with gcc-5.3 (which is actually a x86->ppc cross):
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12762730/
But I can also reproduce with 5.4, and 6.1.0.
Interestingly I *can't* reproduce with the Ubuntu x86->ppc cross
(5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.1).
Those toolchains are all using binutils 2.26 AFAIK.
Going back to a really old toolchain (gcc 4.6.3/binutils 2.22) it does
build but I get these warnings:
powerpc64-linux-ld: drivers/misc/built-in.o: .opd is not a regular array of opd entries
powerpc64-linux-ld: drivers/built-in.o: .opd is not a regular array of opd entries
powerpc64-linux-ld: drivers/built-in.o: .opd is not a regular array of opd entries
powerpc64-linux-ld: drivers/built-in.o: .opd is not a regular array of opd entries
powerpc64-linux-ld: drivers/built-in.o: .opd is not a regular array of opd entries
So probably don't worry about it and we'll try and work it out on our end.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-07 21:57 [PATCH 0/5] lkdtm: add usercopy and rodata, fix atomic Kees Cook
2016-06-07 21:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] lkdtm: split build into multiple source files Kees Cook
2016-06-07 21:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] lkdtm: clean up after rename Kees Cook
2016-06-07 21:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] lkdtm: add function for testing .rodata section Kees Cook
2016-06-08 1:02 ` Laura Abbott
2016-06-08 15:46 ` Kees Cook
2016-06-08 16:15 ` Laura Abbott
2016-06-08 21:26 ` Kees Cook
2016-06-10 1:14 ` Laura Abbott
[not found] ` <87h9b4oebf.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
2016-08-01 19:45 ` Linker segfault on powerpc when CONFIG_LKDTM=y (was Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 3/5] lkdtm: add function for testing .rodata section) Kees Cook
2016-08-02 3:12 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2016-08-02 19:12 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-08-03 4:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-07 21:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] lkdtm: add usercopy tests Kees Cook
2016-06-07 23:36 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-08 0:07 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-07 21:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] lkdtm: split atomic test into over and underflow Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eg67ooe5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®