From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754148AbcFPKaY (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 06:30:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44922 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752158AbcFPKaV (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 06:30:21 -0400 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , Vlastimil Babka , Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: rename _count, field of the struct page, to _refcount" References: <1466068966-24620-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20160616093235.GA14640@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:30:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160616093235.GA14640@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:32:35 -0700") Message-ID: <87eg7xfmtj.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:22:46AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> _count -> _refcount rename in commit 0139aa7b7fa12 ("mm: rename _count, >> field of the struct page, to _refcount") broke kdump. makedumpfile(8) does >> stuff like READ_MEMBER_OFFSET("page._count", page._count) and fails. While >> it is definitely possible to fix this particular tool I'm not sure about >> other tools which might be doing the same. >> >> I suggest we remember the "we don't break userspace" rule and revert for >> 4.7 while it's not too late. > > Err, sorry - this is not "userspace". It's crazy crap digging into > kernel internal structure. > > The rename was absolutely useful, so fix up your stinking pike in kdump. Ok, sure, I'll send a patch to it. I was worried about other tools out there which e.g. inspect /proc/vmcore. As it is something we support some conservatism around it is justified. -- Vitaly