From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933610AbbLORwM (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:52:12 -0500 Received: from smtp11.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.133]:57950 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933455AbbLORwL (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:52:11 -0500 X-ME-Helo: belgarion X-ME-Auth: amFyem1pay5yb2JlcnRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:52:07 +0100 X-ME-IP: 109.222.211.19 From: Robert Jarzmik To: Linus Walleij Cc: Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: pxa: change the interrupt management References: <1449960921-19002-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> X-URL: http://belgarath.falguerolles.org/ Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:52:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Linus Walleij's message of "Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:15:51 +0100") Message-ID: <87egenioqh.fsf@belgarion.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Walleij writes: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > >> The interrupt management is changed by this patch to rely on chip data >> instead of chained interrupts. >> >> The main goal is to loosen the dependency on the global pxa chip >> structure in favor of the passed chip data. The secondary goal is to >> better show in /proc/interrupts the difference between interrupts for >> gpio0 and gpio1 (directly wired to interrupt controller), and the other >> gpios (wired onto a third line in the interrupt controller). >> >> The last advantage of this patch is that the interrupt is actually >> requested, so that another driver cannot steal this line, or overwrite >> the handler. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik >> --- >> Since v1: moved CONFIG_OF for pxa_irq_domain_ops > > I already merged v1 and I don't like to rebase my tree, > can you send an incremental patch fixing this, based off > my "devel" branch? Yeah, sure, I'll just do that. Cheers. -- Robert