From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 395F9407574 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781601830; cv=none; b=q+HbM0KopRh5jr8AMWNnOOxUa4ikqPgymvQ20KIuayhYbDGN6da+1s6Q7ND0STgKgErjCPNY5dwt/ov9jWaoyBPLrUVNb1MdjumVEPpIe5NJxGgyXvF9wgx9r6lplnc11ZXhELqngC8340m45SOgxVlItte/mVE4sVkeupsSNsw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781601830; c=relaxed/simple; bh=klUedJpf6maPoF56W1BBX0R6kzss8gV6pnLtqqah3No=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D4Y1jaGOnCKOBbRLHk76U3MJcVtpMsUHMNKTOaqIgZ5IimvSARpZqlgPQVYTrBs7pq8216YXpJQHBpN2t5xjtT5hgMuVNwbwNmoODYg98AVcOPqtvyxoejS6ajE3PN22gmU42270c55Rx1V52h5LgwuSB86D19fj5s8BuuuXJNQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=yrZrUOE2; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=pulydRLM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="yrZrUOE2"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="pulydRLM" From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1781601827; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=klUedJpf6maPoF56W1BBX0R6kzss8gV6pnLtqqah3No=; b=yrZrUOE2znH7b2eJWLFrtDi5N/MNVBOmnPnWOWx+kyjhp5QiXWrBRddX6DgxRS+Dctmg1o fO6WIseiBJj3e66T9j1t/Vu5of2GozZN6QLbh9DAapjG7alSurjpKXtikCcUJafMtlLqvv JQidIlc/Tlv5ItDJKxxZKWdZxNNtwxyM0avWPdyTC3x9hG1n7qv/DtBJyjDctTCyqFaKLu eZKe8Dl/kvfaDKuyns34gk0lUhXjEd/jeKDOayPT3x0wBdXjvvs1p/qtCfjQ40zqYFOEik APySUnJfn7ml+6LtsgzG6iwYvlESm3eUA4WBl/XIOrfkMlamKXdlj0VB71SrLg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1781601827; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=klUedJpf6maPoF56W1BBX0R6kzss8gV6pnLtqqah3No=; b=pulydRLMMVTemme4v4exPLgQz61MaMXtbFg82aw4rcz/+1jr08yu9qUV4Ei5qScyWJAd2T x8ol+CJOXbv13GDQ== To: Anirudh Srinivasan Cc: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Andrew Jones , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com, ganboing@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: drop __init from vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus In-Reply-To: References: <20260612-vec_unaligned_drop_init-v1-1-df969210ae34@oss.tenstorrent.com> <87ecibwiz6.fsf@yellow.woof> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:23:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87fr2mvnx9.fsf@yellow.woof> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Anirudh Srinivasan writes: > I think the difference seems too small here to draw any conclusions. So the difference is in the noises. That's good to know, thanks for testing. > This is only a 4 core CPU. The probe is done in parallel, so the number of CPUs won't make any noticeable difference. I will send patches in this direction instead. Thanks, Nam