From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4839BC33CB3 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2489120708 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725926AbgA1HHz (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:07:55 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:47982 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725825AbgA1HHy (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:07:54 -0500 Received: from p5b06da22.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.34] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iwKyV-0007Av-Mv; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:07:51 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29366101227; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:07:51 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: [GIT pull 0/7] Various tip branches In-Reply-To: References: <158016896586.31887.7695979159638645055.tglx@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:07:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftg05a9k.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:06 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> the following pull request are my first attempt of using signed >> tags. Please double check and yell if something went wrong. > > Well, the first one looked fine, but the subject lines were a bit odd > on most of them. > > They say "[GIT pull] xyz for" without saying what they are for. So > there's a missing "5.6-rc1" there ;) Indeed. Seems I deleted the check for that second argument when adding the tag magic to the pull request scripting. Added it back now. Thanks, tglx