From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lustre <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/19 - v2] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ldlm_completion_ast()
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:17:30 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fu64r6ed.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151847055674.22826.12912356108048917428.stgit@noble>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5383 bytes --]
If a signal-callback (lwi_on_signal) is set without lwi_allow_intr, as
is the case in ldlm_completion_ast(), the behavior depends on the
timeout set.
If a timeout is set, then signals are ignored. If the timeout is
reached, the timeout handler is called. If the timeout handler
return 0, which ldlm_expired_completion_wait() always does, the
l_wait_event() switches to exactly the behavior if no timeout was set.
If no timeout is set, then "fatal" signals are not ignored. If one
arrives the callback is run, but as the callback is empty in this
case, that is not relevant.
This can be simplified to:
if a timeout is wanted
wait_event_idle_timeout()
if that timed out, call the timeout handler
l_wait_event_abortable()
i.e. the code always waits indefinitely. Sometimes it performs a
non-abortable wait first. Sometimes it doesn't. But it only
aborts before the condition is true if it is signaled.
This doesn't quite agree with the comments and debug messages.
Now that we call the timeout handler (ldlm_expired_completion_wait())
wait directly, we can pass the two args directly rather then
using a special-purpose struct.
Reviewed-by: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
Patrick discovered a bug in v1, which this v2 fixes.
Greg - do you need me to resend the whole series, or are you ok with
taking this replacement in the rest of the original series?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c | 53 +++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
index a244fa717134..c3c9186b74ce 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
@@ -72,15 +72,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(ldlm_enqueue_min, "lock enqueue timeout minimum");
/* in client side, whether the cached locks will be canceled before replay */
unsigned int ldlm_cancel_unused_locks_before_replay = 1;
-static void interrupted_completion_wait(void *data)
-{
-}
-
-struct lock_wait_data {
- struct ldlm_lock *lwd_lock;
- __u32 lwd_conn_cnt;
-};
-
struct ldlm_async_args {
struct lustre_handle lock_handle;
};
@@ -112,10 +103,8 @@ static int ldlm_request_bufsize(int count, int type)
return sizeof(struct ldlm_request) + avail;
}
-static int ldlm_expired_completion_wait(void *data)
+static void ldlm_expired_completion_wait(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u32 conn_cnt)
{
- struct lock_wait_data *lwd = data;
- struct ldlm_lock *lock = lwd->lwd_lock;
struct obd_import *imp;
struct obd_device *obd;
@@ -135,19 +124,17 @@ static int ldlm_expired_completion_wait(void *data)
if (last_dump == 0)
libcfs_debug_dumplog();
}
- return 0;
+ return;
}
obd = lock->l_conn_export->exp_obd;
imp = obd->u.cli.cl_import;
- ptlrpc_fail_import(imp, lwd->lwd_conn_cnt);
+ ptlrpc_fail_import(imp, conn_cnt);
LDLM_ERROR(lock,
"lock timed out (enqueued at %lld, %llds ago), entering recovery for %s@%s",
(s64)lock->l_last_activity,
(s64)(ktime_get_real_seconds() - lock->l_last_activity),
obd2cli_tgt(obd), imp->imp_connection->c_remote_uuid.uuid);
-
- return 0;
}
/**
@@ -251,11 +238,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ldlm_completion_ast_async);
int ldlm_completion_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 flags, void *data)
{
/* XXX ALLOCATE - 160 bytes */
- struct lock_wait_data lwd;
struct obd_device *obd;
struct obd_import *imp = NULL;
- struct l_wait_info lwi;
__u32 timeout;
+ __u32 conn_cnt = 0;
int rc = 0;
if (flags == LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC) {
@@ -281,32 +267,33 @@ int ldlm_completion_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 flags, void *data)
timeout = ldlm_cp_timeout(lock);
- lwd.lwd_lock = lock;
lock->l_last_activity = ktime_get_real_seconds();
- if (ldlm_is_no_timeout(lock)) {
- LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "waiting indefinitely because of NO_TIMEOUT");
- lwi = LWI_INTR(interrupted_completion_wait, &lwd);
- } else {
- lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(timeout * HZ,
- ldlm_expired_completion_wait,
- interrupted_completion_wait, &lwd);
- }
-
if (imp) {
spin_lock(&imp->imp_lock);
- lwd.lwd_conn_cnt = imp->imp_conn_cnt;
+ conn_cnt = imp->imp_conn_cnt;
spin_unlock(&imp->imp_lock);
}
-
if (OBD_FAIL_CHECK_RESET(OBD_FAIL_LDLM_INTR_CP_AST,
OBD_FAIL_LDLM_CP_BL_RACE | OBD_FAIL_ONCE)) {
ldlm_set_fail_loc(lock);
rc = -EINTR;
} else {
- /* Go to sleep until the lock is granted or cancelled. */
- rc = l_wait_event(lock->l_waitq,
- is_granted_or_cancelled(lock), &lwi);
+ /* Go to sleep until the lock is granted or canceled. */
+ if (!ldlm_is_no_timeout(lock)) {
+ /* Wait uninterruptible for a while first */
+ rc = wait_event_idle_timeout(lock->l_waitq,
+ is_granted_or_cancelled(lock),
+ timeout * HZ);
+ if (rc == 0)
+ ldlm_expired_completion_wait(lock, conn_cnt);
+ }
+ /* Now wait abortable */
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = l_wait_event_abortable(lock->l_waitq,
+ is_granted_or_cancelled(lock));
+ else
+ rc = 0;
}
if (rc) {
--
2.14.0.rc0.dirty
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-13 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 21:22 [PATCH 00/19] RESEND staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 01/19] sched/wait: add wait_event_idle() functions NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 06/19] staging: lustre: introduce and use l_wait_event_abortable() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:36 ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2018-02-12 23:58 ` NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 08/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ldlm_completion_ast() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 22:08 ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2018-02-13 0:17 ` NeilBrown
2018-02-13 0:46 ` Patrick Farrell
2018-02-13 20:17 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2018-02-16 14:18 ` [PATCH 08/19 - v2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 05/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout() where appropriate NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 07/19] staging: lustre: simplify l_wait_event when intr handler but no timeout NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 03/19] staging: lustre: replace simple cases of l_wait_event() with wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 04/19] staging: lustre: discard cfs_time_seconds() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 02/19] staging: lustre: discard SVC_SIGNAL and related functions NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 11/19] staging: lustre: remove back_to_sleep() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 09/19] staging: lustre: open code polling loop instead of using l_wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 10/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ptlrpc_invalidate_import() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 13/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout in ptlrpcd() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 12/19] staging: lustre: make polling loop in ptlrpc_unregister_bulk more obvious NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 18/19] staging: lustre: replace l_wait_event_exclusive_head() with wait_event_idle_exclusive NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 15/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_service_unlink_rqbd NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 17/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event from ptlrpc_set_wait NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 19/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event() and related code NeilBrown
2018-02-13 18:15 ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 16/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_unregister_reply NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 14/19] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fu64r6ed.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome