From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264163AbTLAVOt (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:14:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264155AbTLAVMz (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:12:55 -0500 Received: from dci.doncaster.on.ca ([66.11.168.194]:22708 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264163AbTLAVMZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:12:25 -0500 To: Samuel Flory Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: libata in 2.4.24? References: <3FCB8312.3050703@rackable.com> In-Reply-To: <3FCB8312.3050703@rackable.com> From: Greg Stark Organization: The Emacs Conspiracy; member since 1992 Date: 01 Dec 2003 16:12:20 -0500 Message-ID: <87fzg4ckej.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Samuel Flory writes: > It's getting harder to find a newly released motherboard without onboard > sata. Not having libata support means that anyone running 2.4 unpatched will > be unable to use such systems. My motherboard has a SATA controller and I'm using it in non-legacy mode with 2.4.23. What is this libata thing I'm supposed to be needing? -- greg