From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79268298CB7; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769535277; cv=none; b=h1KbCW9Hqx/Bt949Wy4USbh2ApjroEjJB89g8RDuIXhp3UIJ96iRaUGu75yoNRLJwQtNlNhjcAyJM9JHP9tfPJR42ATvP+6k2JI2gRNQPV46o3LjUSKo7+3kesNC4u2q2eohw2uXNasO7JKsWAT8qBWm7ZEqX/bzYi/IsPwLP1M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769535277; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MQPv8mRDarbFVrfScLyJ9gJx+3srgzjmsJZyQYZZFZg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Pj2LQDSBNuYN4Nv7xF7WK2Qs2qel7GtmjyUNb0IxzlijJNarrMIL6kz3gK9jqDApIwqlFhmVeOJDo8dWDldxmZweRs40dOXySxduUq8H+edYtioxnefhhHK1z4NUVEj/ywIYDMLlttTdHwpGYKIst3WP/mN4QjoQF10MHz6zFcY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=JODI+b58; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="JODI+b58" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3C0F740423 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1769535269; bh=I9tbAzh9+2so6qDG2ZSkdL8M4KlDJ3COlQw/r2mGVYk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=JODI+b58ClMA+wvwrXQEi1a6j8LHZ9RQMo/vVyjAb/anFlQvrPPc6i1Hwu5282jM5 YLHEp/RGy1cY+zDA3Ro4sEWh8lldBcyJQvfYa3woqF6Z/sTWYkJzipT46R74zh2LAR 3q6FMaUrwHBeEI4LnpLUF/lqk/s1GPQ39OAPuJtSLkEp4O4lPCL0oQqhj8T4aIHE3t fPP5pJvUc2waXEo73rSnQLxD+1d58ihIiNA24QThy8CUpa8RCKnRB0p21wFYmJOOBk CsgNW47D63mlWWBeIdgq4WrTZHAXAunBVWsBIbJ7FrtgRqb94HFvsXnHUF/xEMMB8P 8+ko0hdh/6AMQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C0F740423; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:34:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Some kernel-doc fixes In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:34:28 -0700 Message-ID: <87h5s79cyj.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > This small series contain 3 patches: > - patch 1 fixes PDF docs build, as reported by Akira; > (I'm resending this one as-is from its v2) > - patch 2 addresses a complain from Jani about not being able > of disabling "-q" flag when building docs with V=0; > - patch 3 addresses an issue indirectly reported by Jani that > it the env vars that affects the wrapper aren't documented. > > With regards to patch 2, docs build honours V=0 by adding a > "-q" flag. > > When V=1 is set, there are two effects in place: > > 1. sphix-build will be called without "-q"; > 2. Sphinx extensions will increase their verbosity levels. > > Sometimes, it is desired to just remove "-q" without increasing > extensions verbosity. That's what patch 2 does. > > IMO, at least patch 1 should be merged during Kernel v6.21 > development cycle. 6.21? I'm kind of assuming you mean the *next* cycle, which will be 7.0? Thanks, jon