From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC2451A314F; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 21:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756504291; cv=none; b=JfFavLcK4nXkHgxadxorhzjFiYzoZjbz/Xn2ngAOfNxsY9VkT87Td/RyDHnoGErV1ykOFVFftfb7NHiyYtjibzUIwMAAT8QbGWSs56OJcNww8vvMJOgSR1qM/UC0y4jIE9V7SiJbi7NjrXzcfysv5S/xkfgGdJq9Wpz5OIMqDSQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756504291; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B/KubSbVqQxL+YvRX1tZrVpBmaUIpPU9eo5VV2C/ktM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aJDNUvjI534qbP4/gtJZwA7j/scHLidGMr3c4rgYEGCFpmriXiv2sadpyzan9d5Z56BfxyFeEA1e2Hs4dXmDj/jlXNt9+JPmJbdFUJCu1YrW6P1aC+74nJmHBn0UbG2HXfK6G4arV7QVRlvKvC5kpL4zOdnllwAn1PMH/AcgC9E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=eCwmDx2p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="eCwmDx2p" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net E422940AE2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1756504288; bh=5CZJ7ehYFc2HvCbpuoy/I5YH1zUHzqDPg8dCzWNSVtw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=eCwmDx2peovL3epK2vRSZRhtFFieHbnyhzKNSYiNrBmvASIcm56NAEE1nKiJvJSNP 7+8Anu6vyQgwUelQyh9Nw0++yl8noM1/XiBfxscIUF2gZC2RB/cjBD9Ar2nQH8fjEb 0z8hY4v4DIDnEmVc6WauaT89o7+yFEKbfsRsbeHBfz8wc9BZxJlzrYaYSkjR6k/bSU WSZhhAzBeO1VfpreunakDBcv0U3CqcMmUaGN+AlW5thDSnSJcJ0qsguyIfZG2D6PaN 0/ZPuup7p4cEN0JnW5Kowhl5L29e1pzkYnNrM6qQcmuczPssyZ7Gub42St9biSwTM8 1hzQxdGq4u6Qw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E422940AE2; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 21:51:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation , Linux ocfs2 Cc: Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , Joseph Qi , Bagas Sanjaya Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: ocfs2: Properly reindent filecheck operations list In-Reply-To: <20250826024756.16073-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> References: <20250826024756.16073-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 15:51:27 -0600 Message-ID: <87h5xp4x0g.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Bagas Sanjaya writes: > Some of texts in filecheck operations list are indented out of the list. > In particular, the third operation is shown not as the third list > item but rather as a separate paragraph. > > Reindent the list so that gets properly rendered as such. > > Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya > --- > .../filesystems/ocfs2-online-filecheck.rst | 20 +++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. jon