From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F376811E2; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724710233; cv=none; b=Ih/JpqNsfgKBxYiF+8ZTO+o4b2xaMnla+NGpVZsVhgXCEKbPDWN3+07JHIHqwOrXMUHH1JH7XCQyBGAvbCmZlEdjE3oDSRBjzwn64xIBgrke8swlMTzLSeSa5hnntsrT3yioU4Miz1lw9CY4BDhObOCMqB+L7IbtmEOgFdFFyHg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724710233; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+fhME1anNiXFk9cxwp5HDp73kiuOhd3OZWYnm6kJPZM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=h5dRJsouKIDwUQ1yj/j1jxEl0uKpVCNVgKV17cQNP7BV7Y/bg7qXJuGVCqYi8XNnVDAb8nBHNrxZgXvN4xg+8DjvAt+DO4lzZxL8Yk6zB/BLhmBDlReJK3HcoSg9XN2cT1/ri9dBryeTaSoxqz53wVcYNI3Xm3wUPV8zYZHOxxw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=A4BiUbdQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="A4BiUbdQ" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 2E1B642D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1724710230; bh=bfUnONFBgHJRpBjL0TK+9yVaRb23+Uddx47+9YN6HUU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=A4BiUbdQotp8Y4IrP97JHP4ZmNl79ktngT3xiZU0VbSDyogi4fXDo8BXhFxb+MU8M pKB+XV5NU9h1opNWmlgyFqi2lJReBBdpptrQZ7AT/ZGH65vZgc+GHjSrSSr2CejGXQ Cv8LjP6V/OM/Y46zCOHfPhwmJwgCvrighzhfQuaCqw26fk0fgGuiYGzZqH9HE9HCwP MR7W8Tma+rw1+yAVBO3GY3gFF5JZ/lwxtlShWdzhmoC9gYzy06qOCS3c8drRQtz50f E3DOVwYyhiyQUcv1A8MuTqL51TZqd11P0Sv9uqjr8aVL4D1Ct/nhuXRjQoJPNDNYxU OHaLc2AYtn4hQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E1B642D39; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:10:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Jani Nikula , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] get_maintainer: add --bug option to print bug reporting info In-Reply-To: <20240815113450.3397499-1-jani.nikula@intel.com> References: <20240815113450.3397499-1-jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:10:29 -0600 Message-ID: <87h6b75416.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jani Nikula writes: > For example Documentation/adming-guide/bug-hunting.rst suggest using > get_maintainer.pl to get a list of maintainers and mailing lists to > report bugs to, while a number of subsystems and drivers explicitly use > the "B:" MAINTAINERS entry to direct bug reports at issue trackers > instead of mailing lists and people. > > Add the --bug option to get_maintainer.pl to print the bug reporting > URIs, if any. > > Cc: Joe Perches > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > --- > scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 17 +++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) I've applied both patches, thanks. jon