From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1DCC48BDF for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 23:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C5D60FF0 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 23:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235247AbhFRXvo (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:51:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58946 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234772AbhFRXvn (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:51:43 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A68EC061574 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:49:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1624060172; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PtTo24AhDPIH9qt+rhf64KdODBLy4eXQI/xHF5KzK4w=; b=ucngxJVeFa2algjCcMptiBxBESUirb6TfP/IT4DnCDdvqnf4TSn83Hf88RQxKmlsxSsOHe UsHFGcZRSKs86toG307HG13Q7G3y2Em5wyovDkHJ9R+VAZ2DVRSUVQM+NdOQQ9g6w1GbXz sW/kqODfQDacZU7mEng+RpY/2v1OwXk88c3c50coTAf0UsqJRGj6PYiQIJUUZZrdml+f7N g7fQwjmsUoFWWIob6TDg6VJHYYlwuKc1b47yFnG3AwNIpsVI71YXICtpmncMB20bVWDfXp Z9G6o0i0+SRg6Qer3psZ0CSV9fjorzqWn6ZIvEsZTVPXzFcqV+PaNiolovvzvw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1624060172; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PtTo24AhDPIH9qt+rhf64KdODBLy4eXQI/xHF5KzK4w=; b=DYuYou+1tqoB2T90IoEW/NBCXIDA+H55dZ6W6iEP1Cs5Wb+7+TURJ1SbUYxwJ3V5yMNXou SheEICLnSD+uS6Bg== To: Andrew Cooper , LKML Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Fenghua Yu , Tony Luck , Yu-cheng Yu , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Kan Liang , Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [patch V3 61/66] x86/fpu/signal: Sanitize the xstate check on sigframe In-Reply-To: References: <20210618141823.161158090@linutronix.de> <20210618143451.325530702@linutronix.de> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 01:49:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7huensk.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew, On Fri, Jun 18 2021 at 22:02, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 18/06/2021 15:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> -static struct _fpx_sw_bytes fx_sw_reserved, fx_sw_reserved_ia32; >> +static struct _fpx_sw_bytes fx_sw_reserved, fx_sw_reserved_ia32 __ro_after_init; > > You probably want a second __ro_after_init here. Ooops. Thanks for spotting it! tglx