From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B2CC43143 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ABC20666 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:04:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C0ABC20666 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mail.parknet.co.jp Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727822AbeI2Qce (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:32:34 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:40466 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727637AbeI2Qce (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:32:34 -0400 Received: from ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (server.parknet.ne.jp [210.171.168.39]) by mail.parknet.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26FAB15AF4A; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:04:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@devron.myhome.or.jp [192.168.0.3]) by ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-12) with ESMTPS id w8TA4gYb019929 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:04:43 +0900 Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-12) with ESMTPS id w8TA4gLg030094 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:04:42 +0900 Received: (from hirofumi@localhost) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w8TA4fAM030093; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:04:41 +0900 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: Andrew Morton Cc: Mihir Mehta , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: Expand a slightly out-of-date comment References: <87sh1tewtw.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <20180928194947.23932-1-mihir@cs.utexas.edu> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:04:41 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20180928194947.23932-1-mihir@cs.utexas.edu> (Mihir Mehta's message of "Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:49:47 -0500") Message-ID: <87h8i8ei12.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mihir Mehta writes: > The file namei.c seems to have been renamed to namei_msdos.c, so I > decided to update the comment with the correct name, and expand it a bit > to tell the reader what to look for. > --- > fs/fat/dir.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c > index 7f5f369..f4db13f 100644 > --- a/fs/fat/dir.c > +++ b/fs/fat/dir.c > @@ -369,7 +369,9 @@ static int fat_parse_short(struct super_block *sb, > } > > memcpy(work, de->name, sizeof(work)); > - /* see namei.c, msdos_format_name */ > + /* For an explanation of the special treatment of 0x05 in > + * filenames, see msdos_format_name in namei_msdos.c > + */ > if (work[0] == 0x05) > work[0] = 0xE5; Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi