From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/10] usb: dbc: handle endpoint stall
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:58:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9gp8298.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D6E380.3060800@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3057 bytes --]
Hi,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> On 26.01.2016 14:58, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> In case of endpoint stall, software is able to detect the situation
>> by reading DCCTRL.HIT or DCCTRL.HOT bits. DbC follows the normal USB
>> framework to handle endpoint stall. When software detects endpoint
>> stall situation, it should wait until endpoint is recovered before
>> read or write oprations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/early/xhci-dbc.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/early/xhci-dbc.c b/drivers/usb/early/xhci-dbc.c
>> index c81df40..344d93e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/early/xhci-dbc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/early/xhci-dbc.c
>> @@ -1163,6 +1163,37 @@ static int xdbc_wait_until_dbc_configured(void)
>> return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> }
>>
>> +static int xdbc_wait_until_epstall_cleared(bool read)
>> +{
>> + int timeout = 0;
>> +
>> + if (read) {
>> + do {
>> + if (!(readl(&xdbcp->xdbc_reg->control) & CTRL_HIT)) {
>> + xdbcp->in_ep_state = EP_RUNNING;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + xdbcp->in_ep_state = EP_HALTED;
>> + xdbc_udelay(10);
>> + } while (timeout++ < XDBC_LOOPS);
>> + } else {
>> + do {
>> + if (!(readl(&xdbcp->xdbc_reg->control) & CTRL_HOT)) {
>> + xdbcp->out_ep_state = EP_RUNNING;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + xdbcp->out_ep_state = EP_HALTED;
>> + xdbc_udelay(10);
>> + } while (timeout++ < XDBC_LOOPS);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> +}
>>
>
> how about something like:
>
> enum xdbc_ep_state *ep_state;
> u32 halt_bit;
>
> if (read) {
> ep_state = &xdbcp->in_ep_state
> halt_bit = CTRL_HIT
> } else {
> ep_state = &xdbcp->out_ep_state
> halt_bit = CTRL_HOT
> }
> do {
> if (!(readl(..) & halt_bit)) {
> *ep_state = EP_RUNNING;
> return 0;
> }
> *ep_state = EP_HALTED;
> delay()
> } while (..)
I'll agree, this looks better. Might also want to refactor the handshake
loop to its own function:
static int xdbg_ep_state_handshake(enum xdbc_ep_state *ep_state, u32 halt_bit)
{
do {
if (!(readl(...) & halt_bit)) {
...
}
*ep_state = EP_HALTED;
delay(...);
} while (...)
>> @@ -1182,6 +1213,11 @@ static int xdbc_bulk_transfer(void *data, int size, int loops, bool read)
>> return -EPERM;
>> }
>>
>> + if (xdbc_wait_until_epstall_cleared(read)) {
>> + xdbc_trace("%s: endpoint not ready\n", __func__);
>> + return -EPERM;
>
> Is -EPERM appropriate here?
>
> Not sure about what error codes the device side is using, but usually
> HALT is set due to some Data buffer/transmission/TRB error.
EIO perhaps ?
> In this case the failure is that debug host failed to send a
> clearFeature(EP_HALT) request in time.
I haven't read the spec, but does it define a maximum time for this to
happen ?
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-26 12:58 [PATCH v7 00/10] usb: early: add support for early printk through USB3 debug port Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] x86: fixmap: add permanent fixmap for xhci " Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] usb: dbc: probe and setup xhci debug capability Lu Baolu
2016-02-16 14:19 ` Mathias Nyman
2016-02-17 8:45 ` Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] usb: dbc: add support for Intel xHCI dbc quirk Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] usb: dbc: add debug buffer Lu Baolu
2016-02-18 11:43 ` Mathias Nyman
2016-02-19 6:35 ` Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] usb: dbc: add bulk out and bulk in interfaces Lu Baolu
2016-02-18 13:32 ` Mathias Nyman
2016-02-19 7:09 ` Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] usb: dbc: handle dbc-configured exit Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] usb: dbc: handle endpoint stall Lu Baolu
2016-03-02 12:58 ` Mathias Nyman
2016-03-02 12:58 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2016-03-03 6:12 ` Lu Baolu
2016-03-03 6:00 ` Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] x86: early_printk: add USB3 debug port earlyprintk support Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] usb: dbc: add handshake between debug target and host Lu Baolu
2016-01-26 12:58 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] usb: doc: add document for xHCI DbC driver Lu Baolu
2016-02-02 14:34 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] usb: early: add support for early printk through USB3 debug port Lu Baolu
2016-02-03 21:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-02-03 23:52 ` Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h9gp8298.fsf@ti.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome