From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: jesse.brandeburg@intel.com
Cc: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>,
"e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 2.6.36 abrupt total e1000e carrier loss (cured by reboot)
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:35:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hbfwojq6.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288837586.2835.3.camel@jbrandeb-mobl2> (Jesse Brandeburg's message of "Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:26:26 -0400")
On 4 Nov 2010, Jesse Brandeburg outgrape:
> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 16:08 -0700, Nix wrote:
>> 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network
>> Connection
>
>> LnkCtl: ASPM L1 Enabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+
>> ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
>
> This is a problem, L0s and L1 don't work on these adapters, make sure
Ah. That sounds like my problem then :) I must say spontaneous link loss
is a rather nasty failure mode (I suspect the hardware simply forgets to
save its state properly when powering down, am I right? So it comes up
effectively turned off and uninitialized...)
> The above could be responsible for your issue. If you don't want to
> disable ASPM system wide, then you could just make sure to run a recent
> kernel with the ASPM patches, or get our e1000.sf.net e1000e driver and
> try it, as it will work around the issue whether or not aspm is enabled.
I was planning to simply split up CONFIG_PCIEASPM to allow me to turn
it off for e1000e only, but this sounds a lot less kludgy. :)
(For now, it's probably simplest to just turn ASPM off, as a quick grep
of the kernel tree shows that that machine has no other hardware for
which ASPM would do a blessed thing: in fact, there *is* no other
hardware in 2.6.36 for which ASPM would do a blessed thing: so if the
only workaround is to turn ASPM off for those adapters, for now I might
as well just turn it off completely.)
Thanks for the advice!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-04 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-31 23:30 Nix
2010-11-01 18:51 ` [E1000-devel] " Tantilov, Emil S
2010-11-01 23:08 ` Nix
2010-11-04 2:26 ` "Brandeburg, Jesse"
2010-11-04 21:35 ` Nix [this message]
2010-11-08 8:01 ` Nix
2010-11-08 18:11 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2010-11-08 20:21 ` Nix
2010-11-14 17:10 ` Nix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hbfwojq6.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome