From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:55:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hc6fpwof.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081110080436.GF2093@elte.hu> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:04:36 +0100")
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
>
> No good ideas - the bug description gives me the impression of memory
> maps save/restore hickup in the hibernation code - and memory maps are
> pretty much the only thing that are significantly different on NUMA.
I assume the problem happened on a single node system.
On single node the memory map should be actually quite similar
to the UMA case.
One possibility would be to bisect if it ever worked?
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-10 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-09 14:07 Pavel Machek
2008-11-10 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 7:55 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-10 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 8:28 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-10 12:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 18:05 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-10 18:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-10 19:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-10 12:55 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-11-10 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-11 10:30 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-11 14:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-11 10:45 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-11 14:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-11 15:03 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-11 16:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 10:49 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-12 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 22:22 ` [PATCH] x86: Hibernate: Fix breakage on x86_32 with CONFIG_NUMA set (was: Re: CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 22:26 ` [PATCH] x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 22:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-12 22:29 ` [PATCH] x86: Hibernate: Fix breakage on x86_32 with CONFIG_NUMA set (was: Re: CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE) Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 8:24 ` CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-10 8:27 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-10 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 18:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hc6fpwof.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®