From: Julien Oster <usenet-20040502@usenet.frodoid.org>
To: Miles Lane <miles.lane@comcast.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DTrace-like analysis possible with future Linux kernels?
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:23:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hdqyogp4.fsf@killer.ninja.frodoid.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408191822.48297.miles.lane@comcast.net> (Miles Lane's message of "Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:22:48 -0400")
Miles Lane <miles.lane@comcast.net> writes:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/08/dtrace_user_take/:
> "Sun sees DTrace as a big advantage for Solaris over other versions of Unix
> and Linux."
That article is way too hypey.
It sounds like one of those strange american commercials you see
sometimes at night, where two overenthusiastic persons are telling you
how much that strange fruit juice machine has changed their lives,
with making them loose 200 pounds in 6 days and improving their
performance at beach volleyball a lot due to subneutronic antigravity
manipulation. You usually can't watch those commercials for longer
than 5 minutes.
The same applies to that article, I couldn't even read it completely,
it was just too much.
And is it just me or did that article really take that long to
mentioning what dtrace actually IS?
Come on, it's profiling. As presented by that article, it is even more
micro optimization than one would think. What with tweaking the disk
I/O improvements and all... If my harddisk accesses were a microsecond
more immediate or my filesystem giving a quantum more transfer rate,
it would be nice, but I certainly wouldn't get enthusiastic and I bet
nobody would even notice.
Maybe, without that article, I would recognize it as a fine thing (and
by "fine" I don't mean "the best thing since sliced bread"), but that
piece of text was just too ridiculous to take anything serious.
I sure hope that article is meant sarcastically. By the way, did I
miss something or is profiling suddenly a new thing again?
Regards,
Julien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-19 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-19 22:22 Miles Lane
2004-08-19 23:01 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-08-19 23:23 ` Julien Oster [this message]
2004-08-19 22:33 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-20 10:08 ` Alex Bennee
2004-08-20 11:21 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-08-20 0:23 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-20 13:34 ` Alexander Nyberg
2004-08-20 13:46 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-20 16:46 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-21 6:03 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-21 6:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-21 6:22 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-21 12:12 ` Julien Oster
2004-08-21 13:27 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-21 21:49 ` Bryan Cantrill
2004-08-23 23:08 ` Christoph Halder
2004-08-22 11:35 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-22 18:27 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-22 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-23 17:34 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-22 23:03 ` John Levon
2004-08-23 19:48 ` Robert Milkowski
2004-08-24 0:39 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-28 19:16 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-29 0:14 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-29 5:30 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 10:45 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-29 17:46 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 10:53 ` Robert Milkowski
2004-08-29 10:29 ` Robert Milkowski
2004-08-31 20:16 ` Timothy Miller
[not found] <2ptdY-42Y-55@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2uPdM-380-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2uUwL-6VP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2uWfh-8jo-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2uXl0-Gt-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vge2-63k-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vgQF-6Ai-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vipq-7O8-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vj2b-8md-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vDtS-bq-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-21 15:01 ` PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices Pascal Schmidt
2004-08-21 15:57 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 11:56 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 13:13 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-08-22 16:00 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-08-22 16:32 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 17:18 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-08-22 19:22 ` DTrace-like analysis possible with future Linux kernels? Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 19:26 ` PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices Tonnerre
2004-08-22 20:14 ` DTrace-like analysis possible with future Linux kernels? Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 20:33 ` Tonnerre
2004-08-22 20:38 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-22 20:43 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 21:37 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-08-23 11:44 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-23 17:40 ` Horst von Brand
[not found] <2v3Ad-5tc-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2v4w9-6aQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vxeJ-4kg-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vZNN-7AT-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2w5q4-34M-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2w9Dq-65C-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-23 18:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-24 4:14 Joerg Schilling
2004-08-28 19:15 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <2wAWW-12a-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-24 13:04 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-08-24 13:07 ` Joerg Schilling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hdqyogp4.fsf@killer.ninja.frodoid.org \
--to=usenet-20040502@usenet.frodoid.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®