From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8248E3CAA31 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790806807; cv=none; b=QUYObhP9JtFwR2UKPjGrlX6IPHlHUJIVcF9bbhIn9WooIdShVxfJrA4N/wvkAxUVW0+nDE3vqcrHb7NG2ZwI6TROe1XPo05rHg7F2RNoTXVgb+HTVYhPiTdfZsA8oJknGylhL9Bf8J8th/6CAsIYKFOPQnFgNV98FSyi46RAjkE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790806807; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AzvdamAAAP67Ngv/cC3rDr0igLnhP+46kJihh3Uo38E=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GidfyYay4MW5+AS+1EXRhf3GBO3amZq8BRSwZsCXZQzSZzuXvi6xlOuxH2c1cMk2cCX44HrO/bZ6/6tofEsz06frWiu+E9Fwi6XKH670rsCpblaedEVkz3aJsxBnWGL2WPQWO00t1VODvLhhyH0/yqNqKwZG7nTBF1KPV1of/eM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=czfhonQg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="czfhonQg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69A871F0089B; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:20:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790806805; bh=x1H1uNrT0p5tMQdqbU5rvowRHlLchaiYrP61GQlAx2o=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=czfhonQg75S1APRy1Hnq6uVH8if1iDIRiUAt2qWdBXGBZX/od1/8vfqP/tvtF0DIe XoSSY2FQTSBJGyb7VUORi3flIWQVUHCjmEp/ymZOwGwYC1u9ER6ZrcemsleOGQk/Re gKBqafWLKwPcHwSUdTvvRBp+8tRycVSDCGs0621+cDErvTx/6B4bbwjvFCzxcmo6HH xkJUKzMZT4KHlMptGicWYwzEoaSwrcjPZrg6S6XobNlf/1DK740nBTwYsNhc00nsGT zBkBH6L9uz+CvyT5FIfwCdSZ8+C3fvfk5ISjuk3EPZ1NluEKektGa3NLwBUB66AOmc 9UPF8vfMR6Pmg== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Sergey Shtylyov , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tick/sched: check skew_tick kernel parameter's validity In-Reply-To: References: <20260829202535.46470-1-s.shtylyov@auroraos.dev> <87ecebj080.ffs@fw13> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87ik3mgz5a.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Sep 30 2026 at 23:04, Sergey Shtylyov wrote: > On 9/30/26 10:01 PM, Sergey Shtylyov wrote: >> Thanks for your comment! >> OK, I'll do that (and add the Suggested-by: tag, of/c)... > > One thing I did forget to ask: we still don't need the Fixes tag here? I have no strong opinion about it, but it's not really fixing a real world problem aside of preventing a sysadmin to shoot himself itno the foot. :)