From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/11] powerpc: Remove unused task argument from prctl functions
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 13:05:21 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87in7ppqj2.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526318067-4964-7-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
> Some powerpc-specific prctl backends take a task argument that is
> redundant, since the only thing ever passed is "current".
>
> This patch gets rid of the redundant arguments.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 16 ++++++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> kernel/sys.c | 12 ++++++------
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
This looks fine. I'm happy for it to get tested in linux-next to shake
out anything subtle.
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-15 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-14 17:14 [RFC PATCH 00/11] prctl: Modernise wiring for optional prctl() calls Dave Martin
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] prctl: Support movement of arch prctls out of common code Dave Martin
2018-05-21 18:28 ` Will Deacon
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] arm64: Move arch-specific prctls out of core code Dave Martin
2018-05-21 18:30 ` Will Deacon
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] MIPS: Remove unused task argument from prctl functions Dave Martin
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] MIPS: Move arch-specific prctls out of core code Dave Martin
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] x86: " Dave Martin
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] powerpc: Remove unused task argument from prctl functions Dave Martin
2018-05-15 3:05 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] powerpc: Move arch-specific prctls out of core code Dave Martin
2018-05-15 3:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] ia64: Remove unused task argument from prctl functions Dave Martin
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] ia64: Move arch-specific prctls out of core code Dave Martin
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] prctl: Remove redundant task argument from PR_{SET,GET}_UNALIGN backends Dave Martin
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] prctl: Refactor PR_{SET,GET}_UNALIGN to reduce boilerplate Dave Martin
2018-05-14 18:28 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] prctl: Modernise wiring for optional prctl() calls Kees Cook
2018-05-15 13:30 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87in7ppqj2.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®