From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: module: fix module_refcount() return when running in a module exit routine
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:24:15 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iofyurzc.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421946175.2093.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 08:50 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> We'll also still need to change scsi_device_put to deal with
>> a negative refcount..
>
> I don't believe so ... we never call module_refcount() now, and the
> actual module ref count never goes negative. That's the point of
> Rusty's change. In the unload routines, the actual module refcount is
> zero. __module_get() will increment this and the final module_put()
> will decrement it without triggering a warning.
>
> In the old code, we expected try_module_get() to fail but then used
> module_refcount() to detect the failure and not do a put.
Yep, I've put that patch in my fixes queue now.
Thanks,
Rusty.
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: scsi: always increment reference count
James reported:
> After e513cc1 module: Remove stop_machine from module unloading,
> module_refcount() is returning (unsigned long)-1 when called from within
> a routine that runs in module_exit. This is confusing the scsi device
> put code which is coded to detect a module_refcount() of zero for
> running within a module exit routine and not try to do another
> module_put. The fix is to restore the original behaviour of
> module_refcount() and return zero if we're running inside an exit
> routine.
The correct fix is to turn try_module_get() into __module_get(), and
always do the module_put().
Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
index e02885451425..9b3829931f40 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
@@ -986,9 +986,9 @@ int scsi_device_get(struct scsi_device *sdev)
return -ENXIO;
if (!get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev))
return -ENXIO;
- /* We can fail this if we're doing SCSI operations
+ /* We can fail try_module_get if we're doing SCSI operations
* from module exit (like cache flush) */
- try_module_get(sdev->host->hostt->module);
+ __module_get(sdev->host->hostt->module);
return 0;
}
@@ -1004,14 +1004,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_get);
*/
void scsi_device_put(struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD
- struct module *module = sdev->host->hostt->module;
-
- /* The module refcount will be zero if scsi_device_get()
- * was called from a module removal routine */
- if (module && module_refcount(module) != 0)
- module_put(module);
-#endif
+ module_put(sdev->host->hostt->module);
put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_put);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-18 16:55 James Bottomley
2015-01-18 23:37 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-19 5:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-01-19 5:51 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-19 8:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-19 16:07 ` James Bottomley
2015-01-19 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2015-01-20 0:45 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-20 2:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-01-20 17:23 ` James Bottomley
2015-01-21 5:30 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-22 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-22 17:02 ` James Bottomley
2015-01-23 2:54 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2015-01-23 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-23 18:42 ` James Bottomley
2015-01-23 23:35 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-26 17:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-28 9:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-28 21:45 ` James Bottomley
2015-01-29 12:16 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87iofyurzc.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome