From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754622AbaEPGXu (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 02:23:50 -0400 Received: from lgeamrelo01.lge.com ([156.147.1.125]:56511 "EHLO lgeamrelo01.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753534AbaEPGXs (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 02:23:48 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.181 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@gmail.com From: Namhyung Kim To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Namhyung Kim , LKML , David Ahern , Andi Kleen , Don Zickus Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] perf tools: Consolidate output field handling to hpp format routines References: <1399876133-17963-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1399876133-17963-7-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20140515120703.GA25858@krava.brq.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:23:36 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20140515120703.GA25858@krava.brq.redhat.com> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Thu, 15 May 2014 14:07:04 +0200") Message-ID: <87iop6kzrr.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 15 May 2014 14:07:04 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 03:28:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > SNIP > >> - } >> - >> if (symbol_conf.use_callchain && sort__has_sym) { >> if (callchain_param.mode == CHAIN_GRAPH_REL) >> total = h->stat.period; >> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c >> index c65a7fd744c6..32d2dfd794d9 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c >> @@ -352,8 +352,18 @@ LIST_HEAD(perf_hpp__sort_list); >> #undef __HPP_ENTRY_RAW_FN >> >> >> +void perf_hpp__setup_output_field(void); > > should go to util/hist.h Okay. > >> { >> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c >> index 9eccf7f4f367..e6920d124c60 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c >> @@ -353,8 +353,7 @@ static int hist_entry__fprintf(struct hist_entry *he, size_t size, >> if (size == 0 || size > bfsz) >> size = hpp.size = bfsz; >> >> - ret = hist_entry__period_snprintf(&hpp, he); >> - hist_entry__sort_snprintf(he, bf + ret, size - ret, hists); >> + hist_entry__period_snprintf(&hpp, he); > > so it's no longer just period.. should we rename it? like > hist_entry__hpp_snprintf > hist_entry__snprintf The hist_entry__snprintf() looks better to me. Thanks, Namhyung