From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756917Ab3HMCd7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:33:59 -0400 Received: from LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.111]:43180 "EHLO LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756737Ab3HMCd6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:33:58 -0400 X-AuditID: 9c93016f-b7cf0ae00000518f-6a-52099b1460fe From: Namhyung Kim To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Olsa , Mike Galbraith , Paul Mackerras , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf tools: add 'keep tracking' test References: <1375882231-18339-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <1375882231-18339-4-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:33:56 +0900 In-Reply-To: <1375882231-18339-4-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (Adrian Hunter's message of "Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:30:31 +0300") Message-ID: <87iozawc8b.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:30:31 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > Add a test for the newly added PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY event. > The test checks that tracking events continue when an > event is disabled but a dummy software event is not > disabled. [SNIP] > +int test__keep_tracking(void) > +{ > + struct perf_record_opts opts = { > + .mmap_pages = UINT_MAX, > + .user_freq = UINT_MAX, > + .user_interval = ULLONG_MAX, > + .freq = 4000, > + .target = { > + .uses_mmap = true, > + }, > + }; > + struct thread_map *threads = NULL; > + struct cpu_map *cpus = NULL; > + struct perf_evlist *evlist = NULL; > + struct perf_evsel *evsel = NULL; > + int found, err = -1; > + const char *comm; > + > + threads = thread_map__new(-1, getpid(), UINT_MAX); > + CHECK_NOT_NULL__(threads); > + > + cpus = cpu_map__new(NULL); > + CHECK_NOT_NULL__(cpus); > + > + evlist = perf_evlist__new(); > + CHECK_NOT_NULL__(evlist); > + > + perf_evlist__set_maps(evlist, cpus, threads); > + > + CHECK__(parse_events(evlist, "dummy:u")); > + CHECK__(parse_events(evlist, "cycles:u")); > + > + perf_evlist__config(evlist, &opts); > + > + evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist); > + > + evsel->attr.comm = 1; > + evsel->attr.disabled = 1; > + evsel->attr.enable_on_exec = 0; > + > + CHECK__(perf_evlist__open(evlist)); > + > + CHECK__(perf_evlist__mmap(evlist, UINT_MAX, false)); > + > + /* > + * First, test that a 'comm' event can be found when the event is > + * enabled. > + */ > + > + perf_evlist__enable(evlist); > + > + comm = "Test COMM 1"; > + CHECK__(prctl(PR_SET_NAME, (unsigned long)comm, 0, 0, 0)); > + > + perf_evlist__disable(evlist); > + > + found = find_comm(evlist, comm); > + if (found != 1) { > + pr_debug("First time, failed to find tracking event.\n"); > + goto out_err; > + } > + > + /* > + * Secondly, test that a 'comm' event can be found when the event is > + * disabled with the dummy event still enabled. > + */ > + > + perf_evlist__enable(evlist); > + > + evsel = perf_evlist__last(evlist); > + > + CHECK__(perf_evlist__disable_event(evlist, evsel)); > + > + comm = "Test COMM 2"; > + CHECK__(prctl(PR_SET_NAME, (unsigned long)comm, 0, 0, 0)); > + > + perf_evlist__disable(evlist); > + > + found = find_comm(evlist, comm); > + if (found != 1) { > + pr_debug("Seconf time, failed to find tracking event.\n"); > + goto out_err; > + } > + > + err = 0; > + > +out_err: > + if (evlist) { > + perf_evlist__disable(evlist); It seems the both of goto out_err already called perf_evlist__disable(). Thanks, Namhyung > + perf_evlist__munmap(evlist); > + perf_evlist__close(evlist); > + perf_evlist__delete(evlist); > + } > + if (cpus) > + cpu_map__delete(cpus); > + if (threads) > + thread_map__delete(threads); > + > + return err; > +}