From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=45.145.95.4 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792831153; b=ORF4etJFbWZQNYceHFylXL5VmILwzZxEOYVRs4MhTNR0+nT8e1q+2eqxjYSwIlB3OdCA Un2K8+gg/hgjmwg/Jdjy4VfkyMQ43kq3R1/B0xlCjEgkyAtB7DJc0SLbeCZre/lhU9vsL 9SC22HIs7ILveyya7siiFUfIB2V1H/2sSIdN+p/FcBO/dhis81MlNKya8sgY7WrQoFLgB Zb4cRrj1mYE+YbjVya9+NwkU9s4/mutXIR2PkFNEfKKHrHQZgQ+QWuBp4wZ0u/xyoBJ2s dnIWgB6LK61oiawMePAnhGjNCSXYhton5oNcDOZhyN6muv/qNwg0MCmg+3Tnn8oX40Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792831153; h=DMARC-Filter:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date: X-Clacks-Overhead:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=CkxCGOO0CuB773M/YWAckLO9nmRNkk1oA8N4cQeEO1o=; b=UU+sR0pz/PiSkjrnHfUPB7FuFQbX5wF+jx09GpIkDvNlcvr8LM0kVSxCNQ2QrWeoQuug NZo9yWDY0QnZ3dZXuQ3GdF34hOXivNDNWEhiRm/8NyT0n11pIepIzEt6NY1wYhAuzmq4m 9qwkmKINJqRBol9a5rPRZoLSmijJfC/C1mGhyxxXr9s8Xcji/imNLC4EacWCwDQx+kiwU WOZfBePpxPrvprQIIh8pLy6VX+drP8ubNU6YCzkWoUkfs/rdmOWRDNWAITOsjxAaqrOVb YpXWAIHmAFUNioauDp1fFrp3RGUX7bPhCaTwEhDjNpHzPvEplkPlx6U2Gk28KZfAnWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=toke.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=toke.dk; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=45.145.95.4 Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8AA0606A31A; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 08:39:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org E8AA0606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=toke.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=toke.dk Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=none From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Tomas Tonhauser Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] wifi: ath9k: clear destination mask for non-aggregate frames In-Reply-To: References: <20261003192957.761090-1-t.tonhauser@pobox.sk> <87mrs9v3aa.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:39:08 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87jyn7pk5v.fsf@toke.dk> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Tomas Tonhauser writes: >> Anyway, I don't think it's unreasonable to add the same retry logic to >> non-aggregated frames that we have for aggregated ones, and the retry_q >> seems like the simplest way to do that. > > I'll work on re-queueing failed/filtered non-aggregate frames on > tid->retry_q for awake stations and send a v2. Alright, sounds good! -Toke