From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C547193077; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745884647; cv=none; b=Se9zTUsvhkRIL2ShS673PdS4moEWwJMWBPcYs1BTy9T3pdDQurDK4JBaGh1L4+namcbguThK6eeagj9XylOzLvBTfcPJJLgcSUyao4XcVOAWisq/xJ4REcnBJZh1+zVKByQjAG+7V8PJ64pkBTx5wnIvtkiE0gxfstlSPWIc2O8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745884647; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wuQ96xWIHnlfvh/BlXNd5KQDLS5DsUL2xmbm2c0BqgQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WcEihFFyoXA5Vbm9gfwLZ8LkA5fvMTyaGAhxAffzikzoCKu8psW0aN4POSFwJyU4baiNCVxLT/4TmWNglkCd60z/J+OqSpsum0a6f0X556VnLGzH6dOioiBhWbT4KScXN7tFGyZTcjnQYaSEtF5lJ7D7zJfl4kIeJgP5oURUixU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=YXkXZfUm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="YXkXZfUm" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 18AB441060 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1745884645; bh=wuQ96xWIHnlfvh/BlXNd5KQDLS5DsUL2xmbm2c0BqgQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=YXkXZfUmPf/IM/oeirBHdFBTzRkbqTRW7m3qQ5CU1sGoZVfWQ/uk5OKqSFMmpHpY4 uxHhQLr2k3WvzS+c80jyz8T1/hiyYZcWheEBeJVNbluGoCEOeFhFBTADqncBPZzFun ut7LRIMLDMiEUY87bUrpaakhuEg27o1RL+igQ++Aazwd5q/lWvQr+Fzzjy9C/41d/1 jjomigfunmRon8gBKwYSzfm+9sGuz3m3wCgCNHrVsFpsmoVNXbS2r/dOtyDln/88pm 37qs03GINNEFhn9J0USak1k8paClFiFZhrwOrNfd0ao9ormPIg5CUZ+6jHfsI13bjv cVFXTmEKD2WnA== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18AB441060; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:57:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Andy Shevchenko , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , Akira Yokosawa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] docs: Makefile: store __pycache__ at the output directory In-Reply-To: References: <1b9e7f34c1d99a27a8abb308da3221b4663b5693.1745539360.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 17:57:24 -0600 Message-ID: <87jz73rg9n.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Andy Shevchenko writes: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 08:08:53AM +0800, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Instead of blocking creation of *.pyc cache, store python >> cache under Documentation/output/__pycache__ > > Do we need the below in the commit message? > I think having statistics is enough and this can be moved to the cover letter. I agree, that was a lot of stuff to get to a one-line fix; I took the liberty of trimming the tree listing out. Applied, thanks. jon