From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2EAC76196 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232559AbjC1MlA (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:41:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53844 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232417AbjC1Mku (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:40:50 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71764AD1B; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 05:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E786F21A1E; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:40:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1680007233; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=vqqlZblvF32Oc3IEsXbE37GU4gfQk/3dHtRa1C6odSg=; b=xHt7RMHDZj9iis1BjDPp6W38V2IQqat+XbSH3pDFr3Q8lMsHhl6OUz4BbYU3sA+TAgW0yZ Ggu1w7SxsIRtvWZzMX9xKCfrTnUEVCcHQngs3zUc4bEE5jkLd/mrFq9nGCWDKHC53Blgvx aRpaNBKDFvI7RbL9f17QXIRbUb1qFSI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1680007233; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=vqqlZblvF32Oc3IEsXbE37GU4gfQk/3dHtRa1C6odSg=; b=o5Jo4JPHBesRVld4amUIZZUpKqjp/6hduT5zW2BbvcHXU86DH/woDQc6NLpc9eMdEXszql bDnM1A3n/EFvo3DQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2B631390D; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id +CQBM0HgImTWOgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:40:33 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:40:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87jzz13v7i.wl-tiwai@suse.de> From: Takashi Iwai To: Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [REGRESSION] e1000e probe/link detection fails since 6.2 kernel User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, we've got a regression report for e1000e device on Lenovo T460p since 6.2 kernel (with openSUSE Tumbleweed). The details are found in https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1209254 It seems that the driver can't detect the 1000Mbps but only 10/100Mbps link, eventually making the device unusable. On 6.1.12: [ 5.119117] e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver [ 5.119120] e1000e: Copyright(c) 1999 - 2015 Intel Corporation. [ 5.121754] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6: Interrupt Throttling Rate (ints/sec) set to dynamic conservative mode [ 7.905526] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 0000:00:1f.6 (uninitialized): Failed to disable ULP [ 7.988925] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 0000:00:1f.6 (uninitialized): registered PHC clock [ 8.069935] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 50:7b:9d:cf:13:43 [ 8.069942] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection [ 8.072691] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: MAC: 12, PHY: 12, PBA No: 1000FF-0FF [ 11.643919] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None [ 15.437437] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None On 6.2.4: [ 4.344140] e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver [ 4.344143] e1000e: Copyright(c) 1999 - 2015 Intel Corporation. [ 4.344933] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6: Interrupt Throttling Rate (ints/sec) set to dynamic conservative mode [ 7.113334] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 0000:00:1f.6 (uninitialized): Failed to disable ULP [ 7.201715] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 0000:00:1f.6 (uninitialized): registered PHC clock [ 7.284038] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 50:7b:9d:cf:13:43 [ 7.284044] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection [ 7.284125] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: MAC: 12, PHY: 12, PBA No: 1000FF-0FF [ 10.897973] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None [ 10.897977] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO [ 14.710059] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None [ 14.710064] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO [ 59.894807] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None [ 59.894812] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO [ 63.808662] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None [ 63.808668] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO The same problem persists with 6.3-rc3. Can you guys check what can go wrong, or if there is a fix? Thanks! Takashi