From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF997C28CBC for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 12:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A64B206DD for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 12:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727932AbgEFMHI (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 08:07:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55964 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727099AbgEFMHI (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 08:07:08 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20942C061A0F for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jWIoq-00029u-8m; Wed, 06 May 2020 14:06:32 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7F6761001F5; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:06:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Miroslav Benes Cc: LKML , x86@kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Andy Lutomirski , Alexandre Chartre , Frederic Weisbecker , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Masami Hiramatsu , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Joel Fernandes , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Brian Gerst , Mathieu Desnoyers , Josh Poimboeuf , Will Deacon , "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 1 05/36] x86/entry: Flip _TIF_SIGPENDING and _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME handling In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 14:06:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87k11pl12w.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Miroslav Benes writes: > On Tue, 5 May 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> Make sure task_work runs before any kind of userspace -- very much >> including signals -- is invoked. > > I might be missing something, but isn't this guaranteed by > do_signal()->get_signal()->task_work_run() path? The changelog is misleading. This is not about task_work it's about TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME. Will fix. Thanks, tglx