From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: bcm2835: Fix polling for completion of DMA with interrupts masked.
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 23:10:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k2i1leap.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607052405.GC16910@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2362 bytes --]
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:33:18AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 07:29:11PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> >> The tx_status hook is supposed to be safe to call from interrupt
>> >> context, but it wouldn't ever return completion for the last transfer,
>> >> meaning you couldn't poll for DMA completion with interrupts masked.
>> >
>> > and why is that?
>>
>> Maybe this was poorly worded. How about:
>>
>> The tx_status hook is supposed to be safe to call from interrupt
>> context. However, the current transfer currently only gets marked
>> complete by the IRQ handler, so if interrupts were masked then polling
>> for completion would never finish.
>
> Sound better :)
>
>>
>> >> This fixes IRQ handling for bcm2835's DSI1, which requires using the
>> >> DMA engine to write its registers due to a bug in the AXI bridge.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/dma/bcm2835-dma.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>> >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm2835-dma.c b/drivers/dma/bcm2835-dma.c
>> >> index 6149b27c33ad..320461c578e3 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/dma/bcm2835-dma.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm2835-dma.c
>> >> @@ -570,16 +570,16 @@ static enum dma_status bcm2835_dma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
>> >> struct virt_dma_desc *vd;
>> >> enum dma_status ret;
>> >> unsigned long flags;
>> >> + u32 residue;
>> >>
>> >> ret = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
>> >> - if (ret == DMA_COMPLETE || !txstate)
>> >> + if (ret == DMA_COMPLETE)
>> >
>> > Why do you change this? txstate can be NULL, so no point calculating reside
>> > for those cases
>>
>> The point was to go into the "Calculate where we're at in our current
>> DMA (if the current DMA is the one we're asking about status for)" path,
>> so that we could note when the DMA is complete even when there's no
>> txstate passed in.
>
> Can you explain what you mean by current DMA!
>
> The claulation is always done for 'descriptor' represnted by the cookie. So
> it doesnt not matter...!
By current I mean the current descriptor that has been submitted to the
hardware, in bcm2835_chan->desc.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-04 2:29 Eric Anholt
2016-06-06 4:26 ` Vinod Koul
2016-06-06 17:33 ` Eric Anholt
2016-06-07 5:24 ` Vinod Koul
2016-06-07 6:10 ` Eric Anholt [this message]
2016-06-07 7:21 ` Vinod Koul
2016-06-07 20:56 ` Eric Anholt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k2i1leap.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net \
--to=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome