From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"zhangwei\(Jovi\)" <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/probes: Fix basic print type functions
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:05:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k3g1t1hw.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131120152245.GB24734@redhat.com> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:22:45 +0100")
Hi Oleg,
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:22:45 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/18, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, "%x", unsigned int)
>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x", unsigned int)
>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%lx", unsigned long)
>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8 , "%x", unsigned char)
>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x", unsigned short)
>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%x", unsigned int)
>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s8, "%d", signed char)
>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s16, "%d", short)
>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s32, "%d", int)
>> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
>> DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, "%llx", unsigned long long)
>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s8, "%d", int)
>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s16, "%d", int)
>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s32, "%ld", long)
>> DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s64, "%lld", long long)
>> +#else /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, "%lx", unsigned long)
>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s64, "%ld", long)
>> +#endif
>
> I must have missed something... Not only I do not understand why
> do we need "#if BITS_PER_LONG", I can't understand why
> DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC() needs "cast" argument.
>
> IOW, how about the patch below instead?
Looks good to me.
Masami, did you have any issue regarding the casts?
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> --- x/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> +++ x/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> @@ -40,23 +40,23 @@ const char *reserved_field_names[] = {
> #define PRINT_TYPE_FMT_NAME(type) print_type_format_##type
>
> /* Printing in basic type function template */
> -#define DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(type, fmt, cast) \
> +#define DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(type, fmt) \
> static __kprobes int PRINT_TYPE_FUNC_NAME(type)(struct trace_seq *s, \
> const char *name, \
> - void *data, void *ent)\
> + void *data, void *ent) \
> { \
> - return trace_seq_printf(s, " %s=" fmt, name, (cast)*(type *)data);\
> + return trace_seq_printf(s, " %s=" fmt, name, *(type *)data); \
> } \
> static const char PRINT_TYPE_FMT_NAME(type)[] = fmt;
>
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, "%x", unsigned int)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x", unsigned int)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%lx", unsigned long)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, "%llx", unsigned long long)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s8, "%d", int)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s16, "%d", int)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s32, "%ld", long)
> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s64, "%lld", long long)
> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, "%x")
> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x")
> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%x")
> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, "%Lx")
> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s8, "%d")
> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s16, "%d")
> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s32, "%d")
> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s64, "%Ld")
>
> static inline void *get_rloc_data(u32 *dl)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-22 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-18 4:40 [PATCH 1/2] tracing/uprobes: Fix documentation of uprobe registration syntax Namhyung Kim
2013-11-18 4:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing/probes: Fix basic print type functions Namhyung Kim
2013-11-20 15:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 6:05 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-11-22 8:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-20 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing/uprobes: Fix documentation of uprobe registration syntax Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k3g1t1hw.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®