mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	jgross@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: avoid crashing on resume after a failure in talk_to_netback()
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 16:40:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lgqb74fp.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170504.112150.391662736580694835.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu, 04 May 2017 11:21:50 -0400 (EDT)")

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:

> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu,  4 May 2017 14:23:04 +0200
>
>> Unavoidable crashes in netfront_resume() and netback_changed() after a
>> previous fail in talk_to_netback() (e.g. when we fail to read MAC from
>> xenstore) were discovered. The failure path in talk_to_netback() does
>> unregister/free for netdev but we don't reset drvdata and we try accessing
>> it again after resume.
>> 
>> Reset drvdata in netback_changed() the same way we reset it in
>> netfront_probe() and check for NULL in both netfront_resume() and
>> netback_changed() to properly handle the situation.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>
> The circumstances under which netfront_probe() NULLs out the device
> private is different than what you propose here, which is to do it
> on a live device in netback_changed() whilst mutliple susbsytems
> have a reference to this device and can call into the driver still.
>
> It is only legal to do this in the probe function because such
> references and execution possibilities do not exist at that point.
>
> What really needs to happen is that the xenbus_driver must be told to
> unregister this xen device and stop making calls into the driver for
> it before you release the netdev state.
>
> That is the only reasonable way to fix this bug.

True,

after looking at the issue again I realized that removing half of the
device in talk_to_netback() is a mistake - we should either treat errors
as fatal and remove the device completely or leave netdev in place
hoping that it'll magically got fixed later. I'm leaning towards the
former, I tried and the following simple patch does the job:

diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
index 6ffc482..7b61adb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
@@ -1934,8 +1934,7 @@ static int talk_to_netback(struct xenbus_device *dev,
        xennet_disconnect_backend(info);
        xennet_destroy_queues(info);
  out:
-       unregister_netdev(info->netdev);
-       xennet_free_netdev(info->netdev);
+       device_unregister(&dev->dev);
        return err;
 }

In case noone is against this big hammer I can send this as v2.

Thank you for your feedback, David!

-- 
  Vitaly

      reply	other threads:[~2017-05-05 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-04 12:23 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-05-04 15:21 ` David Miller
2017-05-05 14:40   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lgqb74fp.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®